首页> 外文会议>Annual Water Environment Federation technical exhibition and conference >Quantitative Comparison of Active and Passive Stormwater Infrastructure: Case Study in Beckley, West Virginia
【24h】

Quantitative Comparison of Active and Passive Stormwater Infrastructure: Case Study in Beckley, West Virginia

机译:主动和被动雨水基础设施的定量比较:西弗吉尼亚州贝克利的案例研究

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this work is to describe through quantitative performance analyses how enabling water resources infrastructure to use data, make decisions, and adapt their behavior in real time makes watershed management more effective and efficient. Herein we compare two different types of stormwater detention ponds, a traditional passive pond and an active pond on which continuous monitoring and adaptive control (CMAC) has been implemented. For the CMAC pond, real site performance data was used from a detention pond in Beckley, West Virginia. For the passive pond, a hydraulic simulation was performed using watershed and basin characteristics identical to the CMAC pond. For a six-month analysis period, we compared the performance of the CMAC pond and the passive pond with respect to water quality, channel protection, and flood mitigation metrics. Conclusions include that optimizing stormwater infrastructure to be active instead of passive yields improved water quality, increased channel protection, and a reduction in flood risk.
机译:这项工作的目的是通过定量绩效分析来描述如何使水资源基础设施能够实时使用数据,制定决策和调整其行为,从而使流域管理更加有效。在这里,我们比较了两种不同类型的雨水滞留池,即传统的被动池和主动池,在这些池上实施了连续监测和自适应控制(CMAC)。对于CMAC池塘,使用了西弗吉尼亚贝克利的一个拘留池的实际现场性能数据。对于被动池塘,使用与CMAC池塘相同的分水岭和流域特征进行了水力模拟。在六个月的分析期内,我们比较了CMAC池塘和被动池塘在水质,河道保护和防洪指标方面的表现。结论包括优化雨水基础设施,使其成为主动而不是被动,可以改善水质,增强河道保护并降低洪水风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号