【24h】

An encounter between Attachment Theory and 4e Cognition

机译:附件理论与4E认知之间的遇到

获取原文

摘要

A number of research questions arise from an encounter between the elements of 4e cognition and Attachment Theory. These include: (1) whether the Attachment Theory concept of Internal Working Models should be understood in terms of analogue representations more in line with embodied cognition, in addition to traditional cognitivist representations like linguistically mediated narrative measures of attachment meaning?; (2) are infant-carer dyads best thought of as environments of contextual embedding for infant cognition or as an arrangement where the carer can actually extend the infant mind?; and (3) are attachment phenomena best thought of in traditional representational terms or should the attachment control system be reframed in enactive terms where traditional cognitivist representations are: (3i) substituted for sensorimotor skill-focused mediating representations, (3ii) viewed as arising from autopoietic living organism and/or (3iii) mostly composed from the non-contentful mechanisms of basic minds?; A theme that cross-cuts these research questions is how representations for capturing meaning, and structures for adaptive control, are both required to explain the full range of behaviour of interest to Attachment Theory researchers. Implications are considered for future empirical and computational modelling research, and clinical interventions.
机译:从4E认知和附着理论的元素之间的遇到之间存在许多研究问题。这些包括:(1)内部工作模型的附着理论概念是否应在模拟表现中更加符合体现的认知,除了传统的Cognitivist表示,如语言上介导的附件意义(如语言介导的叙事措施)? (2)是婴儿卡尔二元的最佳思想作为婴儿认知的环境嵌入的环境或作为护理人员实际延长婴儿心灵的安排; (3)是附着现象,最佳思想在传统的代表性术语中,或者如果附着控制系统在传统的Cognitivist表示所在的条件下重新鉴定:(3i)取代SensorImotole技术聚焦的调解表示,(3II)被视为自动生物生物和/或(3III)主要由非满足的基本思想机制组成?交叉削减这些研究问题的主题是捕获含义和适应性控制结构的表示,都需要解释依恋理论研究人员的全部行为。对未来的实证和计算建模研究和临床干预措施被认为是含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号