【24h】

The role of vascular surgery in management of patients with critic chronic limb ischemia (CLI)

机译:血管手术在评论慢性肢体缺血(CLI)患者管理中的作用

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: During the past decade, dramatic changes have occurred in the field of endovascular management of patients with chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI). Perler and coworkers write that today, we literally have a dozen or so endovascular options for treating CLI. We can dilate it with a balloon, or dilate and cut it with cutting balloon, we can add a stent or primarily stent, with a plain old-fashioned stent, a drug eluting stent, a covered stent or even a biodegradable stent; we can cool it with cryoplasty or we can heat it with laser, or we can radiate it with brachytherapy; or we can slice it with atherectorny. We can even do a percutaneous bypass (1). Although this can be seen as a positive development, clinical studies, trying to justify each treatment modality are flawed for many reasons and the lack of evidence means that the same patient may be offered a completely different treatment depending on the clinician and the hospital. And if treatment fails, we try something else at additional cost or we refer patient to amputation surgeon with comment that everything possible was done to prevent major amputation.
机译:介绍:在过去十年中,慢性临界肢体缺血(CLI)患者血管内管理​​领域发生了巨大变化。佩勒和同事今天写下,我们对治疗CLI有十几种或如此血管内的选择。我们可以用气球扩张,或用切割气球扩张和切割它,我们可以添加一支支架或主要支架,用普通的老式支架,一种药物洗脱支架,覆盖支架甚至可生物降解的支架;我们可以用冷冻成形术冷却,或者我们可以用激光加热,或者我们可以用近距离放射治疗辐射它;或者我们可以用树栖症切。我们甚至可以进行经皮旁路(1)。虽然这可以被视为积极的发展,但临床研究,试图证明每个治疗方式都有许多原因存在缺陷,并且缺乏证据意味着同一患者可以根据临床医生和医院提供完全不同的治疗。如果治疗失败,我们以额外的费用尝试别的东西,或者我们将患者提交对截肢外科医生,评论一切可能是为了防止重大截肢。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号