首页> 外文会议>IISL Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space;International Astronautical Congress >Prescribing the Best Medicine for the Struggling Space Mining Industry: An International Regulatory Agency or Technology Development Centers?
【24h】

Prescribing the Best Medicine for the Struggling Space Mining Industry: An International Regulatory Agency or Technology Development Centers?

机译:规定斗争太空矿业的最佳药品:国际监管机构或技术开发中心?

获取原文

摘要

The space mining industry is literally having trouble getting off the ground. Although there is an abundance of valuable mineral resources on the Moon and near-Earth asteroids and supportive legal instruments, no commercial space mining missions have launched as of this writing. Moreover, the two most prominent space mining companies were bought by other companies at the end of 2018, and their space mining plans seem to be on hold. No matter the cause of this stalemate, this paper argues that the near-term establishment of an international space mining authority with regulatory powers would be detrimental to the already fragile industry. The Outer Space Treaty does not mandate the establishment of such an authority, nor do any of its articles state or imply that nongovernmental activities conducted in outer space require international regulation. While over-extraction and ownership of space resources are serious concerns, provisions of the Outer Space Treaty, national legislation, and non-binding international guidelines will sufficiently mitigate their impact on the industry in the near-term. This paper also supports the incorporation of select principles from the failed Moon Agreement into national legislation and nonbinding international guidelines for space mining. The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and the International Seabed Authority (ISA) are two examples of United Nations agencies that have international authority over primarily private sectors, namely telecommunications and deep-sea mining. This paper compares and contrasts how these two United Nations agencies regulate these sectors and argues that neither model is appropriate for the regulation of the space mining industry in the near-term. Instead of an international regulatory authority, space resource technology research and development centers should be established in interested States. An international agency that mandates how space resource extractions are conducted or decides the ow
机译:太空矿业业实际上遇到了困难。虽然月球和近地区的小行星和支持性法律文书有丰富的矿产资源,但没有商业空间矿业的矿物挖掘任务已经推出。此外,这两个最着名的太空矿业公司于2018年底由其他公司购买,他们的太空采矿计划似乎持有。无论这种僵局的原因,本文认为,与监管权力的国际空间挖掘权威的近期建立对已经脆弱的行业有害。外层空间条约不会授权建立这样的权力,也不遵守其任何文章或暗示在外层空间中进行的非政府活动需要国际监管。虽然过度提取和空间资源的所有权是严重的关切,但外层空间条约,国家立法和无限制的国际指南的规定将充分减轻其对近期行业的影响。本文还支持将失败的月亮协议中的选择原则纳入国家立法和非界任的太空矿业指南。国际电信联盟(ITU)和国际海床管理局(ISA)是联合国各机构的两个例子,这些机构主要拥有主要私营部门,即电信和深海矿业。本文比较和造影了这两个联合国机构如何规范这些部门,并认为这两种模型都不适合在近期监管太空矿业的监管。应在感兴趣的国家建立空间资源技术研究和开发中心,而不是国际监管机构,而是建立空间资源技术研究。一个授权空间资源提取的国际机构进行或决定如何

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号