首页> 外文会议>IISL Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space;International Astronautical Congress >SPACE DEBRIS: BETWEEN UNITY AND FRAGMENTATION-RISK AS A STATIC PRINCIPLE WITH DYNAMIC OUTCOMES
【24h】

SPACE DEBRIS: BETWEEN UNITY AND FRAGMENTATION-RISK AS A STATIC PRINCIPLE WITH DYNAMIC OUTCOMES

机译:空间碎片:团结与碎片 - 风险作为动态结果的静态原则

获取原文

摘要

This paper analyses the interrelationship between science, risk, international law and active debris removal, with the aim to contribute to the progressive development of international law. A large number of disciplines now studies space debris remediation. Broadly speaking, on the one hand, specialised scientific and technical literature provides ever-deeper insight into factual properties of debris remediation. On the other, legal and policy scholarship attempt to analyse, define and qualify the issue with proper concern for its multifaceted societal context. Although these efforts form an indispensable part of the international community's quest for effective debris governance schemes, the insights from these varied fields of inquiry are mutually integrated to only a limited degree, while significant division often remains as well within respective disciplines. Recent difficulties in achieving consensus on relevant matters within COPUOS, as well as criticisms of a perceived firewall between its two Subcommittees, are illustrative of the above dynamic - albeit in a highly politicised context. Evidently, this may pose obstacles to the creation of an informed, uniform and therefore, it is held herein, more effective regulatory regime. As part of a comprehensive analytical and theoretical framework currently under development, this paper posits the common construction of risk and its management as central to the asymptotic realisation of uniformity in standards concerning space debris and its removal. To begin, the paper analyses the theoretical connection between science and law - between scientific facts and legal facts - in combination with a look at examples from practice, including COPUOS and the IADC, as well as case law. The paper then explores scientific insights into debris remediation to uncover the proper extent of the notion of risk in this area. The risk-based perspective appears to emerge therefrom as fundamental. A next section therefore casts light on
机译:本文分析了科学,风险,国际法和积极碎片拆迁之间的相互关系,旨在为国际法进行逐步发展。大量学科现在研究空间碎片补救。一方面,一方面,专业的科学和技术文献提供了更深入地了解碎片修复的事实特性。另一方面,法律和政策奖学金试图分析,定义和限定对其多方面的社会背景的适当关注的问题。虽然这些努力形成了国际社会对有效碎片治理计划的不可或缺的一部分,但这些各种调查领域的见解是仅限于有限程度的相互整合,而重大划分仍然在各自的学科中仍然存在。最近难以实现委员会内有关事项的共识,以及对其两个小组委员会之间的感知防火墙的批评,是上述动态 - 尽管在高度政治化背景下。显然,这可能会对创建知识,统一的障碍构成障碍,因此在此举行,更有效的监管制度。作为目前正在开发的综合分析和理论框架的一部分,本文将风险的共同建设及其管理视为渐近实现空间碎片标准均匀性的核心及其去除。首先,该论文分析了科学事实与法律事实的理论联系 - 同时与练习,包括委员会和国际会议的实践,以及案例法。然后本文探讨了科学的洞察,陷入碎片修复,以发现该领域风险概念的适当程度。基于风险的透视似乎是由此出现的根本性。因此,下一节投射亮起

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号