首页> 外文会议>World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition >Analysis of two typical EV business models based on EV taxi demonstrations in China
【24h】

Analysis of two typical EV business models based on EV taxi demonstrations in China

机译:基于EV出租车示范的两种典型EV商业模式分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Shenzhen and Hangzhou are two demonstration cities for electric taxis applications in China. In this article, the EV taxi business models were introduced and profitability was analysed for battery quick charging in Shenzhen and for battery quick swapping in Hangzhou. The organization patterns of two business models are revealed. The net present value (NPV), the internal rate of return (IRR) and payback period (PP) of the two patterns were calculated by using the value chain analysis method and the cash flow calculation method. The result shows that the NPV and IRR of the two patterns for business models are both negative, payback period are much longer than reference investment, indicating a low profitability even with government subsidies. Sensitivity analysis is carried out to study the impacts of relevant factors on profitability, which indicates that Shenzhen quick charging model are faced with a profit gap while Hangzhou quick charging model are have strong potential of improving profitability through swapping frequency increase. Therefore, they need to be improved by developing profitable business and by enlarging local EV market scale respectively.
机译:深圳和杭州是中国电动出租车应用的两个示范城市。在本文中,介绍了EV出租车商业模式,分析了深圳电池速度充电的盈利能力,并在杭州进行电池快速交换。揭示了两个商业模式的组织模式。净现值(NPV),通过使用价值链分析方法和现金流量计算方法计算两种模式的返回内部返回(IRR)和投资回收期(PP)。结果表明,对于商业模式的两种模式的NPV和IRR的均为负数,投资回收期比参考投资要长得多,即使是政府补贴也要低盈利能力。对敏感性分析进行了研究,以研究相关因素对盈利能力的影响,这表明深圳快速充电模式面临盈利差距,而杭州快速充电模型具有较强的潜力,通过交换频率增加提高盈利能力。因此,他们需要通过开发有利可图的业务并分别扩大当地的EV市场规模来改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号