首页> 外文会议>Workshop on Tropical Legumes for Sustainable Farming Systems in Southern Africa and Australia >Animal Production from Legume-based Ley Pastures in Southeastern Queensland
【24h】

Animal Production from Legume-based Ley Pastures in Southeastern Queensland

机译:昆士兰州东南部的豆科植物牧场的动物生产

获取原文

摘要

As soils used for cropping in central and southeastern Queensland decline in organic matter and available nitrogen, the benefits of using legume-based ley pastures as an alternative to using fertiliser nitrogen are being more widely recognised. However, as well as providing increases in soil fertility for subsequent cropping cycles, ley pastures also need to provide adequate returns to farmers from livestock production. This study at Brian Pastures Research Station in southeast Queensland compared forage and animal production from eight tropical pastures, which included legumes identified in recent evaluation programs and being developed for use by farmers. The pastures used were lablab (Lablab purpureus cv. Highworth), which is an annual legume that was resown each year; Macrotyloma daltonii CPI 60303 and Vigna trilobata CPI 13671, which are annual legumes that regenerate from seed each year; butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea cv. Milgarra) and burgundy bean (Macroptitium bracteatum CPI 27404), which are perennial legumes; a grass pasture of green panic (Panicum maximum var. trichoglume cv. Petrie), creeping bluegrass (Bothriochloa insculpta cv. Bisset) and Queensland bluegrass (Dichanthium sericeum); and the same mixture of grasses with butterfly pea and with caatinga stylo (Stylosanthes seabrana cw. Primar and Unica). End-of-season yields ranged from 1 to 5 t/ha, with lablab and the grass-legume pastures producing the highest yields. M. daltonii and V. trilobata regenerated each year, but regular spraying for weed control was necessary. Burgundy bean persisted for three years and butterfly pea was even more persistent. Both butterfly pea and Caatinga stylo persisted and combined well with the grasses. Lablab produced the most liveweight gain/ha, with growth rates from 0.60 to 0.86 kg/head/day. Growth rates on other legumes varied from 0.39 to 0.79 kg/head/day, and there were some differences in the duration of grazing. Liveweight gain/ha was similar for butterfly pea and burgundy bean and was higher than for V. trilobata, followed by M. daltonii. On the grass and grass-legume pastures, growth rates ranged from 0.39 to 0.71 kg/head/day, with legume-based pasture producing gains of 30 to 70 kg/ha more than the grass-only pasture over five years.
机译:随着用于在中央和东南昆士兰的土壤中的土壤有机质和可用的氮气下降,使用豆类的ley牧场作为使用肥料氮的替代品的益处是更广泛的认可。然而,除了在随后的种植周期中提供土壤肥力的增加,莱斯牧场还需要为来自牲畜生产的农民提供充分的回报。这项研究在昆士兰东南部的Brian牧场研究站,从八个热带牧场的比较和动物生产中,包括最近评估计划中确定的豆类,并由农民制定使用。使用的牧场是Lablab(Lablab purpureus cv。Highworth),这是每年重建的一年一度的豆科植物; Macrotyloma Daltonii CPI 60303和Vigna Trilobata CPI 13671,每年从种子中再生豆类;蝴蝶豌豆(Clitoria Ternatea CV。米尔加拉)和勃艮第豆(Macroptitium Bracteatum CPI 27404),这是多年生豆类;绿色恐慌(Panicum最高var。Trichoglume Cv。Petrie),匍匐蓝草(Bothriochloa Insculpta CV。Bisset)和昆士兰蓝草(Dichanthium Sericeum);和蝴蝶豌豆和凯瑟司机的草地相同的混合物(司发司机Seabrana CW。Primar和Unica)。季前产量为1至5吨/公顷,兰布拉布和草豆类牧场生产最高收益率。 M. Daltonii和V. Trilobata每年再生,但需要定期喷涂杂草控制。勃艮第豆坚持三年,蝴蝶豌豆更持久。蝴蝶豌豆和凯撒骗子都坚持并与草相结合。 LaBlab生产最活力的增益/公顷,增长率从0.60到0.86千克/头/日/天。其他豆类的增长率在0.39至0.79千克/脑海/日内各不相同,并且在放牧期间存在一些差异。 Liveweight Gain / Ha类似于蝴蝶豌豆和勃艮第豆,高于V.Trilobata,其次是M. Daltonii。在草地和草豆类牧场上,增长率范围为0.39至0.71千克/头/日,豆类牧场生产超过30至70公斤/哈的收益超过五年的基层牧场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号