首页> 外文会议>European Powder Diffraction Conference >Line Profile Analysis (LPA) Methods: Systematic Ranking of the Quality of their Basic Assumptions
【24h】

Line Profile Analysis (LPA) Methods: Systematic Ranking of the Quality of their Basic Assumptions

机译:线谱分析(LPA)方法:系统排名其基本假设的质量

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

All methods of analyzing the broadening of XRD line profiles have to take into account two basic effects: broadening by the instrument - including the X-ray spectrum - and the characteristics of broadening by size effects and by lattice defects - including their interaction. These effects are handled in practice by a wide range of auxiliary assumptions. In this paper these assumptions and their quality with respect to "appropriateness of purpose" are listed and compared. By systematic ranking of these assumptions in accordance with their quality, a 2-dimensional map can be constructed that visualizes the differences in the quality of the assumptions. This 2-dimensional map brings a new viewpoint to the various methods for line profile analysis, because it enables a qualitative comparison of the assumptions of existing methods and new developments.
机译:分析XRD线概况扩大的所有方法都必须考虑到两个基本效果:通过仪器扩大 - 包括X射线谱 - 宽度效应和晶格缺陷的特性 - 包括它们的相互作用。 这些效果在实践中通过广泛的辅助假设来处理。 在本文中,列出了这些假设及其在“目的的适当性”的假设和其质量。 通过根据其质量进行系统排序,可以构建二维地图,其可视化假设质量的差异。 这两个维图带来了一种新的视图,以进行线程分析的各种方法,因为它能够定性比较现有方法和新发展的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号