首页> 外文会议>IFIP TC13 international conference on human-computer interaction >Assessing the usability and efficiency of Design Ratioale
【24h】

Assessing the usability and efficiency of Design Ratioale

机译:评估设计理由的可用性和效率

获取原文

摘要

Many positive claims have been made about the benefits of Design Rationale (DR). MacLean et al, (1991) argue that an explicit design rationale can be a useful tool in the design process in a variety of ways: from reasoning and reviewing to managing, documenting, and communicating. Design rationale is the notion that goes beyond merely accurate descriptions of artifiacts, such as specifications, and articlates and represents the reasons and reasoning process behind the design and specification of artifacts (Moran & Carroll, 1996). QOC (Questions, Opions, Criteria) is a straightforward notation ofr representing design rationale (MacLean et al, 1991), In this paper we presetn the results of a study investigating the usability and efficiency of DR/QOC as a design support tool. and provide an analysis of the designers' reflections on the role of DR/QOC in the design process.
机译:对设计理由(DR)的好处进行了许多积极的索赔。 Maclean等人,(1991)认为,明确的设计理由可以是设计过程中的有用工具,各种方式:从推理和审查管理,记录和沟通。 设计理由是超越仅仅是准确描述ARIFIACTS的概念,例如规格和曲线,并且代表了工件设计和规范背后的原因和推理过程(MORAN&CARROLL,1996)。 QoC(问题,选项,标准)是代表设计理由的直接符号(Maclean等,1991),本文预先调查研究DR / QOC作为设计支持工具的可用性和效率的研究结果。 并对设计人员对设计过程中DR / QoC作用的反思进行分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号