首页> 外文会议>World congress on ergonomics >Ergonomics in the Brazilian Judicial System: a case study from the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice
【24h】

Ergonomics in the Brazilian Judicial System: a case study from the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice

机译:巴西司法系统中的人体工程学:Rio de Janeiro国家法院的案例研究

获取原文

摘要

The Brazilian judicial system is being reformed due to its lack of efficiency and to high social expectations. There are also many work-related injuries, including musculoskeletal and psychological disorders. Ergonomics has been introduced into some services so as to address these health problems, and to help their stakeholders better organize their work systems. This paper aims to discuss ergonomics' contribution to judicial work systems and the effectiveness of a specific mode of introducing ergonomics to organizations - an ergonomics committee. This paper describes and evaluates the introduction of ergonomics conducted by an academic ergonomic team in the Court of Justice for Labor in Rio de Janeiro. A documental analysis (reports and official documents) and interviews conducted with the central players (ergonomists and justice stakeholders) were the methods applied. These provide a narrative of the whole process that describes the three interventions over the last five years and discusses the development of an internal ‘ergonomic committee'. The participation of external ergonomists led to some improvements in many workplaces (new furniture and layout), technical systems (software) and work organization. The ergonomists also trained justice stakeholders in ergonomics to support the launch of the ergonomic committee. However, because there were no full time ergonomists in the service, consequently its capacity to solve ergonomic problems limited. This case shows firstly that judicial work systems appear to be a very important field of research and intervention in Brazil. Secondly, the ergonomic committee may be seen only as an intermediary step of introducing ergonomics to organizations; the ergonomic introduction itself calls for the development of professional ergonomic services.
机译:由于缺乏效率和高社会期望,巴西司法系统正在改革。还有许多与工作有关的伤害,包括肌肉骨骼和心理障碍。人体工程学已被引入一些服务,以解决这些健康问题,并帮助他们的利益相关者更好地组织他们的工作系统。本文旨在讨论人体工程学对司法工作系统的贡献,以及将人体工程学的特定模式的有效性 - 人体工程学委员会。本文介绍并评估了在Rio de Janeiro司法司法法院在律法中进行的人体工程学的引入。用中央球员(人体工程学家和司法利益攸关方)进行的文件分析(报告和官方文件)和采访是应用的方法。这些提供了整个过程的叙述,该过程描述了过去五年中的三个干预措施,并探讨了内部“人体工程学委员会”的发展。外部人体工程学家的参与导致了许多工作场所(新家具和布局),技术系统(软件)和工作组织的一些改进。人体工程学家还经过人体工程学培训了司法利益相关者,以支持人体工学委员会的推出。但是,由于该服务中没有全年人工学家,因此其解决人体工程学问题有限的能力。本例首先显示,司法工作系统似乎是巴西的研究和干预领域。其次,人体工程学委员会可以作为向组织引入人体工程学的中介步骤来看待;符合人体工程学的介绍本身呼吁开发专业人体工学服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号