首页> 外文会议>Annual Waste Management Symposium >CHANGING NOTIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN THE DECISION TO HOST A NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGE FACILITY ON THE SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTE RESERVATION
【24h】

CHANGING NOTIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN THE DECISION TO HOST A NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGE FACILITY ON THE SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTE RESERVATION

机译:在决定举办核燃料储存设施的核燃料储存设施的决定中改变了环境司法的概念

获取原文

摘要

This paper examines the conflict surrounding the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians’ decision to host an interim storage facility for high-level radioactive waste on their reservation in Utah. This paper challenges the predominant tradition of environmental justice scholarship and activism that focus on the inequitable distributio n of hazards in low-income minority communities. We examine the underlying historical, political, and geographical contexts of the emerging nuclear landscape of the American West and focus on how the political and environmental dynamics of siting a nuclear facility intersect with issues of community self-determination and identity formation. Specifically, we examine notions of tribal sovereignty and contemporary tribal identity politics and how these complicate and hinder tribal involvement in a full range of decisions about development. Environmental justice activism and literature tend to restrictively define the authentic indigenous response to development and natural resource management, particularly when projects are controversial and technologically complex. The restrictive definition expects that tribes will refuse to grapple with technology, calling it an anti-spiritual manifestation of the non-tribal world. In labeling the tribal response, there is no distinction made between the variety of indigenous players and distinct communities represented, the differing scopes of governing authority, and heterogeneous responses to projects tagged as environmentally unjust. Rarely is there discussion of the range of values placed on specific sites by specific tribes and how these values should inform development decisions. Finally, this view of “authentic,” legitimate tribal involvement undermines the capacity building necessary for tribes to achieve a level of sovereignty and justice where they are educated and proactive in a full range of development and resource management decisions.
机译:本文研究了GOSHUTE INDIRES在犹他州预订的高级放射性废物中迎接临时储存设施的古斯印第安人的头骨谷乐队周围的冲突。本文挑战了环境司法奖学金和激活主义的主要传统,重点关注低收入少数民族社区的不公平分布。我们研究了美国西部新兴核景观的潜在历史,政治和地理背景,并专注于利用核设施与社区自决和身份形成问题相交的政治和环境动态。具体而言,我们研究部落主权和当代部落身份政治的概念以及这些复杂和阻碍部落参与的全部决策以及如何复杂和阻碍部落的参与。环境司法活动和文献倾向于限制性地定义了对发展和自然资源管理的真实的土着反应,特别是当项目存在争议和技术复杂时。限制性的定义预计部落将拒绝努力与技术,称之为非部落世界的反精神表现。在标签部落反应时,在指标的各种土着球员和不同的社区之间没有区别,管理权威的不同范围,以及标记为环保不公正的项目的异构反应。很少有特定部落在特定部位上放置在特定站点的价值范围以及这些价值观如何通知发展决策。最后,这种“真实”的合法部落参与破坏了部落所需的能力建设,实现他们在全面的开发和资源管理决策中受过教育和主动的主权和正义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号