【24h】

Spectral Clustering with Brainstorming Process for Multi-View Data

机译:用于多视图数据的头脑风暴过程的光谱聚类

获取原文

摘要

Clustering tasks often requires multiple views rather than a single view to correctly reflect diverse characteristics of the cluster boundaries. The cluster boundaries estimated using a single view are incorrect in general, and those incorrect estimation should be compensated by helps of other views. If each view is independent to other views, incorrect estimations will be mostly revised as the number of views grow. However, on the contrary, as the number of views grow it is almost impossible to avoid dependencies among views, and such dependencies often delude correct estimations. Thus, dependencies among views should be carefully considered in multi-view clustering. This paper proposes a new spectral clustering method to deal with multi-view data and dependencies among views. The proposed method is motivated by the brainstorming process. In the brainstorming process, an instance is regarded as an agenda to be discussed, while each view is considered as a brainstormer. Through the discussion step in the brainstorming process, a brainstormer iteratively suggests their opinions and accepts others' different opinions. To compensate the biases caused by information sharing between brainstormers with dependent opinions, those having independent opinions are more encouraged to discuss together than those with dependent opinions. The conclusion step makes a compromise by merging or concatenating all opinions. The clustering is finally done after the conclusion. Experimental results in three tasks show the effectiveness of the proposed method comparing with ordinary single and multi-view spectral clusterings.
机译:群集任务通常需要多个视图而不是单个视图来正确反映群集边界的不同特征。使用单个视图估计的群集边界通常是不正确的,并且这些错误估计应该通过其他视图的帮助来补偿。如果每个视图都独立于其他视图,则将不正确的估计大多是重新修订的,因为视图的数量增长。然而,相反,随着观点的数量增长,几乎不可能避免视图之间的依赖性,并且这种依赖性通常欺骗正确的估计。因此,应在多视图聚类中仔细考虑视图之间的依赖性。本文提出了一种新的谱聚类方法来处理多视图数据和视图之间的依赖性。所提出的方法是通过头脑风暴过程的激励。在头脑风暴过程中,一个实例被视为要讨论的议程,而每个视图被视为头脑风暴。通过头脑风暴过程中的讨论步骤,头脑风暴迭代地表明他们的意见并接受了其他人的不同意见。为了补偿由受抚养意见的头脑风暴之间共享的信息共享造成的偏见,更鼓励与具有依赖意见的人员一起讨论的人的偏差。结论步骤通过合并或串联所有意见来妥协。结论后,终于完成了聚类。在三个任务中的实验结果表明了与普通单视图光谱群集相比的提出方法的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号