【24h】

Comparative analysis of scan compression techniques

机译:扫描压缩技术的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

Design for Testability (DFT) based on scan and ATPG has been adopted as a reliable and broadly acceptable methodology that provides very high test coverage, but for large circuits, the growing test data volume causes a significant increase in test cost because of much longer test time and elevated tester memory requirements. Test compression or scan compression provides great reduction in test data volume and test time required by adding on-chip decompressor and compactor. In this paper comparative analysis are made for Broadcast, XOR decompressor along with XOR, MISR and Hybrid compactors with respect to test coverage, test cycles required and test data volume by considering Flash Interface as CUT. From the experiments, it is observed that XOR decompressor with MISR compactor architecture provides 17.31% to 49.76% reduction in test data volume compared to other architectures, with 99.76% of fault coverage, 16694 test cycles and 2104μm of area overhead.
机译:基于扫描和ATPG的可测试性(DFT)设计被采用可靠且广泛可接受的方法,提供了非常高的测试覆盖,但对于大电路,由于更长的测试,越来越多的测试数据量导致测试成本显着增加 时间和高架测试记忆内存要求。 测试压缩或扫描压缩可降低测试数据容量和通过添加片上的解压缩器和压缩机所需的测试时间。 在本文中,对广播,XOR减压器以及XOR,MISR和混合压实机的比较分析,通过考虑闪光灯接口作为切割而需要测试覆盖,测试周期和测试数据量。 从实验中,观察到,与其他架构相比,具有MISR压实机架构的XOR解压缩器可降低17.31%至49.76%的测试数据量减少,有99.76%的故障覆盖率,16694个测试周期和面积2104μm面积开销。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号