首页> 外文会议>International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering >Comparison of Four Time Series Forecasting Methods for Coal Material Supplies: Case Study of a Power Plant in Indonesia
【24h】

Comparison of Four Time Series Forecasting Methods for Coal Material Supplies: Case Study of a Power Plant in Indonesia

机译:四种时间系列预测方法的比较煤材料供应方法:印度尼西亚电厂的案例研究

获取原文

摘要

Coal is the main fuel in the production process at PT PJB UBJ O&M Tenayan. As a raw material, coal needs to be considered in terms of supply to prevent losses (depreciation in caloric content) in case of oversupply. This study aimed to compare four forecasting methods for coal material supply. The four methods of time series forecasting are the moving average method, the weighted moving average, the single exponential smoothing, and the linear regression. Forecasting error calculations used the smallest MAD, MSE, and MAPE error parameters, whereas the tracking signal was used to monitor the forecasting results. The data required were coal supply and demand. Based on the data processing obtained, results of this study show that the best method is linear regression with the results of the MAD value of 13,285.63, MSE of 228,778,800, and MAPE of 15.04%. Based on the results of the tracking signal, the forecasting results were within the control limits, which shows that the linear regression method is the best forecasting method that can be applied to control coal supply in the next period.
机译:煤炭是PT PJB UBJ O&M Tenayan生产过程中的主要燃料。作为原材料,需要在供应方面考虑煤炭以防止供过于求的情况下(卡路里含量折旧)。本研究旨在比较煤料供应的四种预测方法。四种时间序列预测方法是移动平均方法,加权移动平均值,单指数平滑和线性回归。预测错误计算使用最小的MAD,MSE和MAPE错误参数,而跟踪信号用于监控预测结果。所需的数据是煤炭供需。基于获得的数据处理,本研究的结果表明,最佳方法是线性回归,其疯狂值为13,285.63,MSE为228,778,800,MAPE为15.04%。基于跟踪信号的结果,预测结果在控制限制内,这表明线性回归方法是可以应用于下一个时期控制煤供应的最佳预测方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号