【24h】

Lack of Authority, Failure of Leadership-Burden of Not Being Led

机译:缺乏权威,领导力的失败 - 不被带领

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this research is to scrutinize the difference between autocratic leadership and absence of leadership. We utilized simple division between autocratic leader and laissez-faire leader in order to find out how these stereotypical leaders' are affecting the followers. Typically, autocratic leadership is situated to be bad leadership approach and follower's freedom is emphasized. Cognitive constructivism and empowerment of followers are embracing the freedom and followers own responsibility. However, the question for best approach for leadership is too complex to be answered with easy solutions. Real world cases rarely fit to ideal models. In this article, we analyze how these two types of extreme ends in leadership behavior affect the followers' feeling of certainty. We show how these approaches affect to followers by analyzing open answers with a mix method design with both quantitative and qualitative analysis.
机译:本研究的目的是仔细审查专制领导和缺乏领导的差异。 我们在专制领导者和Laissez-Faire领导者之间利用了简单的部门,以了解这些陈规定型领导人如何影响追随者。 通常,专制领导力位于糟糕的领导方法,并强调了追随者的自由。 认知建构主义和赋予追随者的权力是拥抱自由和追随者自己的责任。 但是,有关领导力的最佳方法的问题太复杂,无法通过简单的解决方案来回答。 现实世界案例很少适合理想的模型。 在本文中,我们分析了领导行为中这两种类型的极端结局如何影响追随者的追随者的确定性。 我们展示了如何通过分析具有定量和定性分析的混合方法设计的打开答案来对追随者影响这些方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号