首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Administrative Science >Bureaucracy in Criminal Justice - A Study of Criminogen Factors in Law Enforcement on Narcotics Crime Settlement
【24h】

Bureaucracy in Criminal Justice - A Study of Criminogen Factors in Law Enforcement on Narcotics Crime Settlement

机译:刑事司法的官僚机构 - 犯罪犯罪定居点执法中的犯罪因素研究

获取原文

摘要

The criminal justice system is conducted through bureaucracy, with hope that law enforcement can proceed smoothly, efficiently and responsibly. However, this does not apply in the settlement of narcotics cases. The research method used to solve the problem is the approach toward law as law in action. The determination of a user as an addict, a suspect/convicted person is carried out by court based result assessment from Integrated Assessment Team. The Team works through a bureaucracy and procedures. Regulation as the legal basis for the work of assessment teams which are unclear, overlapping, and bad behavior of law enforcement apparatus. It resulted in the assessments that oftentimes are being formally defective, so that the result cannot be used by the court as evidence. This fact indicates that the workings of the law through the bureaucracy cannot be separated from bureaucratic failure.
机译:刑事司法系统是通过官僚主义进行的,希望执法能够顺利,有效和负责任地进行。但是,这不适用于麻醉案的结算。用于解决问题的研究方法是法律作为行动法的方法。根据综合评估团队的法院的结果评估,将用户作为瘾君子的确定作为瘾君子,嫌疑人/被定罪者进行。该团队通过官僚机构和程序工作。规定是评估团队工作的法律依据,目不是执法设备的重叠,重叠和不良行为。它导致评估通常是正式有缺陷的,因此法院不能被法院作为证据使用。这一事实表明,通过官僚机构的法律工作不能与官僚主义失败分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号