首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Public Policy, Social Computing and Development >Government Policy in the Management of Border Conflict Between Indonesia and Oecusse District, Timor Leste
【24h】

Government Policy in the Management of Border Conflict Between Indonesia and Oecusse District, Timor Leste

机译:政府政策在印度尼西亚和OeCusse区之间的边境冲突管理,东帝汶

获取原文

摘要

This research describes the types, causes and consequences of border conflict, and government policy in the management of border conflict between Indonesia and Oecusse District, Timor Leste. Research data were obtained through in-depth interview, focus groups (FGs) and document review, while data analysis used qualitative analysis technique. This research found several types of border conflict between Indonesia and Oecusse District, Timor Leste such as communal, inter-state, horizontal, latent, extraordinary, damaging, threat on state sovereignty, and threat on social order of border society from both sides. Causes of the border conflict are administrative/political history and contemporary. The border conflict also tends to destroy sosial/political relation, socio-cultural values and safety among border society. Indonesia obeys adequately regulation such as "border line agreement", but has not yet used customary law to resolve the border conflict. Indonesian central government is slightly slow while provincial government of East Nusa Tenggara, and district government of Kupang and North Middle Timor are faster enough in managing the border conflict. Indonesian government is able to protect border societies and assure their safety, but less equal in determining border line in conflict segments. It has also conducted diplomacy and negotiation with Timor Leste government, but it is still unsuccessful yet to convince Timor Leste government in resolving unresolved segments. It should continuously do diplomacy and negotiation with Timor Leste government to manage and resolve the border conflict by considering simultaneously administrative/politics, border history, customary law, equity and togetherness.
机译:本研究介绍了边境冲突的类型,原因和后果,以及帝国举行的印度尼西亚和OeCusse区边境冲突管理。通过深入访谈,焦点小组(FGS)和文件审查获得了研究数据,而数据分析使用定性分析技术。本研究发现了印度尼西亚和OeCusse区之间的几种边界冲突,东帝汶区,如公共,国家间,水平,潜在,损害,威胁对国家主权的危害以及对双方的边境社会社会秩序的威胁。边境冲突的原因是行政/政治历史和当代。边境冲突还倾向于摧毁边境社会中的生长/政治关系,社会文化价值和安全。印度尼西亚遵守充分规定,如“边境协议”,但尚未使用习惯法解决边境冲突。印度尼西亚中央政府略微慢,而东南腾加拉省省政府和北朝鲜和北中小汶区政府在管理边境冲突方面则略微更快。印度尼西亚政府能够保护边境社团,并确保其安全,但在确定冲突段的边界线方面的安全性。它也进行了外交和谈判与东帝汶政府,但它仍然不成功,但要说服东帝汶政府在解决悬而未决的片段。它应该不断与东帝汶政府的外交和谈判,通过审议同时行政/政治,边界历史,习惯法,公平和团结,管理和解决边境冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号