首页> 外文会议>International Conference and Workshop on Mathematical Analysis and its Applications >Performance and Separation Occurrence of Binary Probit Regression Estimator Using Maximum Likelihood Method And Firths Approach Under Different Sample Size
【24h】

Performance and Separation Occurrence of Binary Probit Regression Estimator Using Maximum Likelihood Method And Firths Approach Under Different Sample Size

机译:不同样本大小下使用最大似然法和触发方法的二元探测回归估计的性能和分离发生

获取原文

摘要

The parameters of binary probit regression model are commonly estimated by using Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method. However, MLE method has limitation if the binary data contains separation. Separation is the condition where there are one or several independent variables that exactly grouped the categories in binary response. It will result the estimators of MLE method become non-convergent, so that they cannot be used in modeling. One of the effort to resolve the separation is using Firths approach instead. This research has two aims. First, to identify the chance of separation occurrence in binary probit regression model between MLE method and Firths approach. Second, to compare the performance of binary probit regression model estimator that obtained by MLE method and Firths approach using RMSE criteria. Those are performed using simulation method and under different sample size. The results showed that the chance of separation occurrence in MLE method for small sample size is higher than Firths approach. On the other hand, for larger sample size, the probability decreased and relatively identic between MLE method and Firths approach. Meanwhile, Firths estimators have smaller RMSE than MLEs especially for smaller sample sizes. But for larger sample sizes, the RMSEs are not much different. It means that Firths estimators outperformed MLE estimator.
机译:通过使用最大似然估计(MLE)方法通常估计二元探测回归模型的参数。但是,如果二进制数据包含分离,MLE方法有限。分离是存在一个或多个独立变量的条件,该变量精确地将类别分组为二进制响应。它将导致MLE方法的估计变为非收敛性,因此它们不能用于建模。解决分离的努力之一是使用Firths方法。这项研究有两个目标。首先,识别MLE方法与纤维方法之间二元探测回归模型中分离发生的机会。其次,比较MLE方法和使用RMSE标准获得的二进制探测回归模型估计器的性能。使用仿真方法和不同的样本大小进行那些。结果表明,小样本大小的MLE方法中分离发生的可能性高于触发方法。另一方面,对于更大的样本量,在MLE方法和纤维方法之间的概率下降且相对相同。同时,Firths估计器比MLE更小,特别是对于较小的样本尺寸。但是对于较大的样本尺寸,RMSE不大。这意味着Firths估计器优于MLE估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号