首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Innovations in Electronics, Signal Processing and Communication >Finger Photoplethysmogram Signal Enhancement: Comparing Performance between PCA and ICA Methods
【24h】

Finger Photoplethysmogram Signal Enhancement: Comparing Performance between PCA and ICA Methods

机译:手指光电子测量信号增强:比较PCA和ICA方法之间的性能

获取原文

摘要

Pulse signal is prone to corruption with motion artifacts (MA) due to attachment of the sensor to extreme body parts like finger, toes and forehead. This paper compares the performance between two popular statistical signal processing tools, viz., principal component analysis (PCA) with fast independent component analysis (fICA) in reduction of MA from finger pulse signal collected from 30 human volunteers. A multivariate dataset was generated with systolic peak-aligned Photoplethysmogram (PPG) beats extracted from time series data. After eigenvalues decomposition of the covariance matrix, the original data was reconstructed using the first principal component. The mean correlation coefficient of average beat template of ICA preprocessed data and clean data, averaged over 30 volunteers is 0.9876 while that of PCA preprocessed data with clean data is 0.9778. With white Gaussian noise of known SNR, maximum absolute error for PCA preprocessed data is very small, 3.14% from SNR 25dB onwards. It was also found that beat to beat correlation is higher in the PCA preprocessed data.
机译:由于传感器的附接到像手指,脚趾和前额的极端身体部位,脉冲信号与运动伪影(MA)易于腐败。本文比较了两个流行统计信号处理工具,viz之间的性能,具有快速独立分量分析(FICA)的主成分分析(PCA),从30人志愿者收集的手指脉冲信号减少MA。使用从时间序列数据提取的收缩峰对准的光增性肌谱(PPG)节拍产生多变量数据集。在特征值之后,使用第一主组件重建原始数据。 ICA预处理数据和清洁数据的平均平均平均节拍模板的平均相关系数超过30个志愿者是0.9876,而PCA的PCA预处理数据具有清洁数据为0.9778。随着已知SNR的白色高斯噪声,PCA预处理数据的最大绝对误差非常小,来自SNR 25dB的3.14%。还发现PCA预处理数据中的节拍击败相关性更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号