首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society international annual meeting >Comparison of Two Electronic Order Forms for Medical Consultation: Think-Aloud Usability Assessment With Referring Clinicians
【24h】

Comparison of Two Electronic Order Forms for Medical Consultation: Think-Aloud Usability Assessment With Referring Clinicians

机译:对医学咨询的两种电子订单表格的比较:与引用临床医生进行思考的可用性评估

获取原文

摘要

Due to its early role in the medical referral process, the consultation order is a focal point for breakdowns in communication about referrals. Both referrers and consultants agree that the current approach to referral communication is flawed, and poor usability of electronic health record (EHR) user interfaces (UIs) is a contributing factor (Mehrotra, Forrest, & Lin, 2011; O’Malley & Reschovsky, 2011; Zuchowski et al., 2015). To improve EHR UIs for ordering consultations, experts have recommended including these features: a list of consulting services, integrated clinical information (e.g., relevant diagnostic test results), referral guidelines (e.g., when not to order a consultation), clear options for communicating urgency (e.g., urgent or routine), and multiline free-text fields, including one field to indicate the reason for consultation (Bergus, Emerson, Reed, & Attaluri, 2006; Esquivel, Sittig, Murphy, & Singh, 2012; Militello et al., 2016). Our objective was to assess users’ reactions to these recommendations with a comparative usability evaluation. We designed a UI prototype for consultation orders that incorporated the aforementioned recommendations. We hypothesized that the prototype would elicit more positive comments about its usability than would the UI of a currently available EHR (a control UI).
机译:由于其早期在医学转诊过程中作用,咨询令是关于宣传沟通的崩溃的焦点。推荐人和顾问都认为,目前的转介通信方法有缺陷,电子健康记录(EHR)用户界面(UIS)的可用性差是一个贡献因素(Mehrotra,Forrest,&Lin,2011; O'Malley&Reschovsky, 2011; Zuchowski等人。,2015)。为了改善ehr uis进行订购咨询,专家推荐包括这些特征:咨询服务列表,综合临床信息(例如,相关诊断测试结果),转诊指南(例如,当不订购咨询时),清除沟通选择紧急(例如,紧急或常规)和多行自由文本字段,包括一个字段,以指示咨询的原因(Bergus,Emerson,Reed,&Attaluri,2006; Esquivel,Sittig,Murphy,&Singh,2012; Militello et al。,2016)。我们的目标是通过比较可用性评估评估用户对这些建议的反应。我们为咨询订单设计了UI原型,纳入上述建议。我们假设原型会引起其可用性的更积极评论,而不是当前可用的EHR(一个控制UI)的UI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号