首页> 外文会议>Australasian Weeds Conference >Weed management is not quite 'Bush Regeneration'-An opinion
【24h】

Weed management is not quite 'Bush Regeneration'-An opinion

机译:杂草管理不是“布什再生”的意见

获取原文

摘要

As long-term practitioners of managing weeds in varied circumstances, we notice the increasing trend towards bush-regeneration as a broad approach to weed management, particularly in New South Wales (NSW). Recent observations in the Sydney basin and other parts of NSW show that bush-regeneration has not achieved the desired weed control outcomes for major weed species that have plagued eastern Australia for decades. These include semi-terrestrial species - alligator weed (Al-ternanthera philoxeroides(Mart.) Griseb), primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana (L.) Hara), long-leaf willow primrose (Ludwigia longifolia (DC.) Hara), and full-terrestrial species such as blackberry (Rubus fruiticosus L. species aggregate), Chilean needle grass (Nassella neesiana (Trin. & Rupr.) Barkworth), Coolatai grass (Hyparrhenia hirta (L.) Stapf) and green cestrum (Cestrumparqui L'Her.). Added to this are infestations of: interstate invaders such as golden wreath wattle (Acacia saligna (Labill.) H.L. Wendl.); fully aquatic invaders, such as egeria (Egeria densa (L.) Planch); and terrestrial invaders expanding their range southwards, such as groundsel bush (Bac-charis halimifolia L.). Following an initial survey in 2009, we now observe these weeds greatly expanded invading new areas. We attribute inadequate local control primarily to the change in approach adopted by some agencies: i.e. a greater portion of funding used for bush-regeneration, instead of, as previously, weed management. We appreciate the noble goal of bush-regeneration, that is to assist regeneration of native bushlands from a diminished quality to a better condition. However, we lament the techniques used have limited value in controlling the large-scale infestations of highly invasive weeds. Indeed, the adoption of bush-regeneration as the primary paradigm for funding appears to be self-serving for some stakeholders. We suggest that well-coordinated, direct control, deployed on a regional-, catchment- and local-site-scale, is the only way to contain highly invasive weeds. We contend, that unless there is a change in weed management investment, these well-known invaders will soon become so entrenched that they will become widespread and likely to be given lower priority for management.
机译:作为在各种情况下管理杂草的长期从业者,我们注意到布什再生的趋势越来越呈一种广泛的杂草管理方法,特别是在新的南威尔士(NSW)中。最近在悉尼盆地和新南威尔士州其他地区的观察结果表明,丛林再生尚未为澳大利亚东部困扰的主要杂草物种达到所需的杂草控制结果。这些包括半陆地物种 - 鳄鱼杂草(Al-Ternanthera Philoxeroides(Mart。)Griseb),Primrose Willow(Ludwigia Peruviana(L.)Hara),长叶柳报春花(Ludwigia longifolia(DC。)Hara),和满 - 黑莓(Rubus Firsticosus L.物种骨料),智利针草(Nassella Neesiana(Trin。&Rupr。)Barkworth),Coaratai Grass(Hiparrhenia Hirta(L.)Stapf)和Green Sestrrum(Cestrumparqui L'她。)。添加到这是侵扰的:州际入侵者,如金花圈·荆棘(金合欢萨尔尼亚(吉尔。)H.L.Wendl。);完全水生侵犯者,如埃克威(Egeria Densa(L.)Planch);和陆地入侵者扩大了他们向南的范围,例如Groundsel Bush(Bac-Charis Halimifolia L.)。在2009年的初步调查之后,我们现在观察这些杂草大大扩展了入侵新领域。我们将本地控制不足,主要是某些机构通过的方法的变化:即,用于布什再生的大部分资金,而不是以前,杂草管理。我们感谢丛林再生的高尚目标,即协助原生丛林的再生从减少质量到更好的状况。然而,我们哀叹使用的技术在控制高度侵入性杂草的大规模侵犯方面具有有限的价值。实际上,采用灌木再生作为资金的主要范式似乎是一些利益攸关方的自我服务。我们建议在区域,集水区和本地方位规模上部署的协调直接控制,是含有高度侵入性杂草的唯一方法。我们争辩,除非杂草管理投资发生变化,否则这些着名的入侵者将很快变得如此根深蒂固,以至于他们将变得普遍,并可能获得较低的管理优先权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号