首页> 外文会议>Annual^Meeting of the American^Association^of^Swine^Veterinarians. >Comparative efficacy evaluation of two modified-live PRRS vaccines
【24h】

Comparative efficacy evaluation of two modified-live PRRS vaccines

机译:两种改性活PRRS疫苗的比较疗效评估

获取原文

摘要

The swine industry continues to experience significant losses due to PRRS virus infections of sow farms and growing pigs.1 Modified-live vaccine (MLV) can significantly reduce PRRSV induced lung lesions following a heterologous challenge.2 In addition, it has been demonstrated that the implementation of a systematic methodology for PRRS control that utilizes modified-live vaccine for the control of wild type-PRRSV infections can mitigate the consequences of infection on health and performance.3'1 Itis necessary for modified-live vaccines to be effective against heterologous challenge with current PRRSV field isolates. The objective of this study was to directly compare the efficacy of Ingelvac PRRS~R MLV (BIVI-Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.,St. Joseph, MO) and Prime Pac~ PRRS + (Merck Animal Health, Omaha, NE) against a heterologous PRRSV challenge in a standard respiratory challenge model in growing pigs.
机译:由于母猪农场的PRRS病毒感染和生长猪的PRRS病毒感染,猪行业继续损失.1改性活疫苗(MLV)可以显着减少异源挑战后的PRRSV诱导的肺病变。利用改性活疫苗的PRRS控制的系统方法的实施可以减轻对健康和性能的影响.3'1 ITIS对异源挑战有效的改性活疫苗必需使用当前的PRRSV现场隔离。本研究的目的是直接比较Ingelvac PRRS〜R MLV(Bivi-Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica,Inc.,St.Joseph,Mo)和Prime Pac〜PRRS +(Merck Animal Health,Omaha,Ne)对抗的疗效生长猪的标准呼吸挑战模型中的异源PRRSV挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号