首页> 外文会议>Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Symposium >A Thermodynamics of Teams: Towards a Robust Computational Model of Autonomous Teams
【24h】

A Thermodynamics of Teams: Towards a Robust Computational Model of Autonomous Teams

机译:团队的热力学:迈向自治团队的强大计算模型

获取原文

摘要

One of the great puzzles in social science is the failure of rational models of teamwork, a rising concern for Artificial Intelligence researchers. Social learning theory (i.e., rewards and punishments; associations; modelling) works partially with individuals, but not with teams. These theories of methodological individualism, including, but not limited to, game theory, have also failed to advance the field of economics. To address interdependence, the phenomenon central to teamwork, we explain why game theory, the first to study interdependence mathematically, has failed. As an alternative, we offer a non-rational theory composed at this time of three parts: quantum mathematics for interdependence (e.g., interference); biology for population effects; and min-max entropy production as a metric of good and unsatisfactory team performance for humans or artificial agents (with min entropy production as LEP, and maximum entropy production as MEP). We report on three mathematical breakthroughs: First, that the interdependence between an individual's observations and actions, once measured, breaks the link known as intuition, leading to the measurement problem of incompleteness, accounting for the failure of survey instruments to predict human action; second, that at the team and larger levels of analyses, the ill-effects on min-max entropy production of consensus-seeking rules and authoritarian leadership serve to suppress the search for solutions to the problems that teams work to solve; and third, as a speculation to integrate group decision-making and a team's emotions: with LEP as a team's ground state versus a team with internal conflict at an elevated LEP state.
机译:社会科学中的一个伟大谜题之一是团队合作的理性模型失败,对人工智能研究人员的兴趣令人担忧。社会学习理论(即,奖励和惩罚;协会;建模)部分地与个人一起工作,但不是团队。这些方法的个人主义理论,包括但不限于博弈论,也未能推进经济学领域。为了解决相互依存,现象是团队合作的现象,我们解释了为什么博弈论,首先要在数学上学习相互依存,已经失败了。作为替代方案,我们提供了在此时的三个部分组成的非合理理论:相互依存的量子数学(例如,干扰);人口效应的生物学;最小最大的熵产量作为人类或人工代理的良好和不满意的团队表现的公制(Min Entopy生产为LEP,以及MEP的最大熵产量)。我们报告了三个数学突破:首先,一个人的观察和行动之间的相互依存,一旦测量,就会打破称为直觉的链接,导致不完整的测量问题,核对调查工具预测人类行动的失败;其次,在团队和更大的分析中,对寻求共识规则和专制领导的敏能熵产生的不良影响有助于抑制对团队努力解决问题的问题的解决方案;第三,作为一项猜测集团决策的猜测和团队的情绪:LEP作为团队的地面州,与一个在LEP国家的内部冲突的团队。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号