首页> 外文会议>FSE/SDP workshop on future of software engineering research >Requirements Engineering at the Margins: Avoiding Technological Hubris through Alternative Approaches
【24h】

Requirements Engineering at the Margins: Avoiding Technological Hubris through Alternative Approaches

机译:利润率要求工程:通过替代方法避免技术套管

获取原文

摘要

Technological hubris occurs when attempts are made to develop technological solutions for marginalized groups. Despite being impoverished, these groups constitute the bulk of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) users. Developers all too often assume these peripheral, marginalized groups have the same needs as people in the core, developed countries and engineer technologies accordingly. Likewise, software engineers typically use the same approaches to elicit requirements and develop technologies for such groups. Both these tactics run the risk of disregarding the true needs of such users by not taking their environment, social order, or influences of either into account. Our position is that developers must reconsider current, widely adopted requirements engineering approaches when developing ICT for marginalized groups. We advocate embracing alternative techniques from the social sciences, here considering two such techniques, namely cultural probes and storytelling. We explore how these techniques can be adapted for software requirements.
机译:在尝试开发边缘化群体的技术解决方案时,会发生技术哈布里斯。尽管受到贫困,但这些群体构成了大部分信息和通信技术(ICT)用户。开发人员常常假设这些外围设备,边缘化群体相应地具有与核心,发达国家和工程技术中的人相同的需求。同样,软件工程师通常使用相同的方法来引出要求和为这些组开发技术。这两种策略都冒着不采取他们的环境,社会秩序或对账户的影响来忽视这些用户的真实需求的风险。我们的立场是,开发商必须在开发边缘化群体的ICT时重新考虑当前的,广泛采用的需求工程方法。我们主张从社会科学的拥有替代技术,考虑到两种这样的技术,即文化探针和讲故事。我们探讨这些技术如何适应软件要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号