首页> 外文会议>International Applied Mechanics, Mechatronics Automation System Simulation Meeting >Investigation of Relationship between Instrumented Indentation Nominal Hardness and Reduced Elastic Modulus with Large Apex Angle Indenter
【24h】

Investigation of Relationship between Instrumented Indentation Nominal Hardness and Reduced Elastic Modulus with Large Apex Angle Indenter

机译:仪表压痕标称硬度与大顶角压痕减少弹性模量的研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Based on dimensional analysis, finite element numerical calculation is undertaken on elastic-plastic solids to investigate the relationship between instrumented indentation nominal hardness H_n and reduced elastic modulus E_r for three different apex angle indenters. The half-included angles of axisymetric conical indenter models are 62.9°, 70.3° and 85.566° which are corresponding to the real indenters of cube corner indenter with 60° face angle, Berkovich indenter with 65.27° face angle and cube corner indenter with 85° face angle, respectively. The relationship between a nominal hardness/reduced elastic modulus (H_n/E_r) and elastic work/total indentation work (W_e/W_t) is established with a sixth-order polynomial form for each apex angle indenter. For rigid indenter of instrumented indentation model, reduced elastic modulus E_r=1/[(1+v~2)/E], where E and v are elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio of the indented material. Therefore, H_n/E_r-W_e/W_t relationship can be used to give estimates of E. Accuracy estimation for the each relationship of each half-included angle indenter shows that the large half-included angle of 85.566° gives better Er measurement error of +11.56% for a low yield strength material (e.g., materials for which σ_y=100MPa, n=0 and E=200GPa), while for the smaller half-included angle of 62.9° or 70.3° indenter, the measurement error is > ±12.74%. The research in this paper confirms that H_n/E_r-W_e/W_t relationship of large apex angle indenter such as 85.566° half-included angle is recommended to be used for estimating the elastic modulus E of indented material.
机译:基于尺寸分析,在弹性塑料固体上进行有限元数值计算,以研究仪表压痕标称硬度H_N与三种不同顶点角压延的减少的弹性模量E_R之间的关系。 Acsymetric Conical Indenter模型的半夹角是62.9°,70.3°和85.566°,其与具有60°面角的立方角压缩的真正压头相对应,Berkovich Indenter具有65.27°面部角度和带85°的立方角压缩脸部角度分别。标称硬度/减小的弹性模量(H_N / E_R)和弹性工作/总缩进工作(W_E / W_T)之间的关系是以每个顶点角压缩的第六阶多项式形式建立的。对于仪表压痕模型的刚性凹对,减少的弹性模量E_R = 1 / [(1 + V〜2)/ e],其中E和V是弹性模量和泊松的凹痕。因此,可以使用H_N / E_R-W_E / W_T关系来给出E.每个半夹角压痕的每个关系的准确度估计表明,大约85.566°的大角度为+提供更好的ER测量误差。 11.56%的低屈服强度材料(例如,σ_y= 100mpa,n = 0和e = 200gpa)的材料,而对于较小的半夹角的角度为62.9°或70.3°压紧,测量误差为>±12.74 %。本文的研究证实,建议使用大顶点角压痕的H_N / E_R-W_E / W_T关系,例如85.566°半角度,以用于估计凹进材料的弹性模量E.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号