首页> 外文会议>European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics Conference >Food, sustainability and ecological responsibility: hunger as the negation of human rights
【24h】

Food, sustainability and ecological responsibility: hunger as the negation of human rights

机译:食品,可持续性和生态责任:饥饿作为人权的否定

获取原文

摘要

What will future generations think of our current lifestyle, of our unbridled consumption of food and energy and, on the other hand, our inexcusable degree of responsibility for hunger? How is it possible that we are now capable of producing enough food for all of humanity and that, at the same time, tens of thousands of people are allowed to die every day? Will we go lazily on shunning reality, submerged in passivity and oblivious to the havoc wreaked by virulent poverty ? Undoubtedly periods of worsening crisis - ecological, environmental and economic- like the present, aside from their inherent and manifest negativity, represent a real opportunity to examine and question fundamental aspects of our growth model, as well as to revise ways of usingnatural resources and means of coexistence that have been in practice until now. For that reason the goal of the present talk is to deal with some of the key elements explaining and demonstrating the reasons for the unviability of the present model of development, while at the same time correcting the domination that has historically characterized western man's relationship to nature. Which, besides its seamlessly integrated progress, generates so much hunger and misery everywhere. So it is that the only dwelling suitable for hunger must be the museum of history, definitively forming part of an atavistic past, burdened down by inequality and a biting injustice. Nonetheless, to ensure that this proposal become effective, the problem has to be rethought,but beyond political and economic thinking, or eminently technical analysis chained to instrumental rationality. And thus, as J. Habermas insists, the suitable framework properly corresponds to the sphere of moral responsibility. And one of the unavoidable questions is 'How can we surpass the anthropocentrism of an ethics that excludes from the circle of its recipients mute nature and creatures capable of suffering, but who lack language'?
机译:会有什么子孙后代认为我们目前的生活方式,我们的食品和能源的消耗肆无忌惮的和,而另一方面,我们对饥饿的责任不可原谅的程度?这怎么可能,我们现在能生产足够的粮食为全人类的情况,而且在同一时间,数万人被允许每天死吗?我们会懒洋洋地去回避现实,淹没在被动和忘却的灾难肆虐的致命的贫困?危机恶化无疑时期 - 生态,从他们固有的环境和economic-像本,一边表现消极,代表了真正的机会来审视和质疑我们的增长模式的基本方面,以及对usingnatural资源和手段的修改方法共存已经在实践直到现在。出于这个原因,本讲的目标是处理一些解释和演示了目前发展模式的unviability的原因,而在同一时间纠正统治已经历史特点西部人与自然的关系的关键要素。其中,除了其无缝集成的进步,产生了这么多的饥饿和苦难无处不在。因此,它是唯一的住宅适合饥饿必须是历史的博物馆,明确形成隔代遗传过去的一部分,不平等和不公正咬下来的负担。然而,为了确保这一提议生效,这个问题必须重新思考,但超越政治和经济思想,或者链接到工具理性突出地的技术分析。因而,如哈贝马斯坚持认为,在合适的框架正确对应于道德责任的范围。和不可避免的一个问题是“我们怎样才能超越伦理,从它的接受者静音特性和能力痛苦的动物,但圈子排除谁缺乏语言的人类中心主义”?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号