首页> 外文会议>Construction Research Congress >Project Performance of Public-Private Partnership Projects Based on Various Contract Agreements and Correlation with Funding Mechanism
【24h】

Project Performance of Public-Private Partnership Projects Based on Various Contract Agreements and Correlation with Funding Mechanism

机译:基于各种合同协议和与资金机制相关性的公私伙伴关系项目的项目绩效

获取原文

摘要

In the past, the state department of transportations (DOTs) used to build the highways and bridges through the traditional delivery method, design-bid-build (DBB). However, in the last couple of decades, alternative delivery methods, design-build (DB), and general contractor/construction management (GC/CM) were widely used in the construction of highways and bridges. These alternative delivery methods were employed when the state had a hundred percent funding available for the design and construction of the projects. Due to the scarcity of the public fund for highways and bridges, recently the public-private partnership (PPP) delivery method has been developed, so that the state can benefit from private funding to build the public projects. There are various types of PPP contract agreements, e.g., design-build-finance-operate-maintenance (DBFOM), design-build-finance-operate (DBFO), design-build-finance-maintenance (DBFM), and build-operate-transfer (BOT). Considering the recent use of different PPPs in highway and bridge projects, no study has been conducted to determine whether the type of PPP contract agreements has any effect on the cost and schedule performance of the projects. Therefore, this study has collected 10 PPP projects with two types of contract agreements, DBFOM and DBFM, to determine if there is any project performance difference in PPP projects. Through a data analysis, the results showed a slightly better cost performance and a significantly better schedule performance for DBFOM projects. Investigating funding and finance sources revealed the considerable difference in public funding and private finance between these two PPP agreements, which may be attributable to the difference found in cost and schedule performance. There have been some limitations in the number of projects, first due to the number of existing projects, and second, the available data to collect for the analysis. Similar to any new adoption, this limitation will be eliminated over time.
机译:过去,国家运输部(DOTS)用于通过传统的递送方法构建高速公路和桥梁,设计 - 出价(DBB)。然而,在过去几十年中,替代交付方法,设计 - 构建(DB)和一般承包商/施工管理(GC / CM)被广泛用于高速公路和桥梁的建设。这些替代交付方法是在该州的百分之百可用于设计和建造项目的资金时。由于高速公路和桥梁公共基金的稀缺性,最近开发了公私伙伴关系(PPP)交付方法,使国家可以从私人资金中受益,以建立公共项目。有各种类型的PPP合同协议,例如,设计 - 构建 - 金融操作 - 维护(DBFOM),设计 - 构建金融操作(DBFO),设计 - 构建 - 金融 - 维护(DBFM),并构建操作 - 翻译(Bot)。考虑到最近在公路和桥梁项目中使用不同的PPP,未进行研究以确定PPP合同协议的类型是否对项目的成本和进度绩效产生了任何影响。因此,本研究收集了10种类型的合同协议,DBFOM和DBFM的PPP项目,以确定PPP项目中是否存在任何项目性能差异。通过数据分析,结果表明略大的成本性能和DBFOM项目的表现明显更好。调查资金和财务来源揭示了这两项PPP协议之间的公共资金和私人金融差异,可归因于成本和清单绩效的差异。项目数量有一些局限性,首先是由于现有项目的数量以及第二个,可用数据收集分析。类似于任何新的采用,随着时间的推移将消除这种限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号