首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Ergonomics and Human Factors >Can we enhance transfusion incident reporters' awareness of human and organisational factors?
【24h】

Can we enhance transfusion incident reporters' awareness of human and organisational factors?

机译:我们可以加强输送事件记者对人类和组织因素的认识吗?

获取原文

摘要

The importance of considering human and organisational factors when reporting transfusion incidents has been highlighted recently. The UK haemovigilance scheme, Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT), has established over the past two decades that most incidents are caused by human errors in the transfusion process. To enhance the incident reporter's awareness of human and organisational factors, we implemented two interventions and evaluated the effects. First, we created and incorporated a bespoke human factors investigation tool (HFIT) which explicitly asks for the level of contribution of individual staff member(s), the local environment or workspace, organisational or management and government or regulation. Second, we created and incorporated a self-learning package linked to the UK national haemovigilance reporting database, showing both good and poor examples of human and organisational factors reporting with discussions about the merits of these different reports. Data from this tool have been analysed to investigate whether increased learning is possible. The main conclusion after one year's use of the HFIT, was that incident reporters tended to attribute culpability mostly to individuals (62.6%). It is possible this result is due to lack of system awareness amongst incident reporters. Six-month initial data analysis after the inclusion of the self-learning package shows that if the incident reporter has studied the self-learning package before scoring the level of contribution associated with an incident, there is a slightly lower tendency to attribute most responsibility to individuals.
机译:在最近突出了报告输血事件时考虑人类和组织因素的重要性。英国血统计划,严重的输血危害(射击),在过去的二十年中建立了大多数事件是由于输血过程中的人类错误引起的。为提高事件记者对人类和组织因素的认识,我们实施了两次干预措施并评估了这些效果。首先,我们创建并注册了一个定制的人为因素调查工具(HFIT),明确要求各个工作人员,当地环境或工作空间,组织或管理和政府或监管的贡献水平。其次,我们创建并纳入了与英国国家摇篮报告数据库相关的自学包,展示了人类和组织因素的良好和差别,并在讨论关于这些不同报告的优点。已经分析了该工具的数据以调查是否有可能增加学习。在一年利用HFIT后的主要结论是,事件记者往往将持股性归因于个人(62.6%)。这一结果可能是由于事件记者缺乏系统意识。六个月的初始数据分析纳入自学包后,表明,如果事件记者在评分与事件相关的贡献水平之前研究了自学套餐,则略低倾向于将最责任归咎于个人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号