首页> 外文会议>World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering, Architecture, Urban Planning Symposium >Revitalisations in Polish Health Resorts vs.European Measures
【24h】

Revitalisations in Polish Health Resorts vs.European Measures

机译:波兰健康度假村的复兴vs.european措施

获取原文

摘要

Nowadays there are 45 statutory health resorts,which means that the conditions and effectiveness of the treatment they offer is guaranteed by the state.Additionally,several dozen locations have natural medicinal resources,which are used to varying degrees.Many locations which served as health resorts in the interwar period,no longer fulfil this function.After the World War II all health resorts operating within the territory of the country were nationalised,but all of the ones that had been operating before obtained relevant statutes.Due to investments carried out in health resorts in time of socialism,many of such locations were subjected to excessive urbanisation,becoming bigger towns with the population of over ten thousand,in others the functions of leisure and tourism were being simultaneously developed,many of them assumed additional administrative functions,becoming seats of communes and counties.After regaining independence in 1989,long-tenn discussions were conducted devoted to the form and new legal solutions for health resort treatment.Simultaneously,a long-term discussion was launched on possible forms of privatisation of Polish health resorts.In principle,it consisted of three stages,and consequently heirs of former owners started to regain their properties only at the beginning of the 21st century.Owing to investments made in health resorts by different business entities in the years 1950-1989 and during the first years of privatisation,when single sanatoria or leisure facilities got sold,these returns actually referred to parts of treatment facilities or single buildings.Simultaneously,Polish health resorts started to be sold to different business entities and municipalised.Heirs of former owners,local authorities,as well as new users of health resort facilities conducted all sorts of adaptation,investment,and renovation works.They focused on the improvement of the quality of the facilities,devices,and space connected with health resort treatment,but they were also connected with the increase of the functional and aesthetic attractiveness of the entire town or village.Comparison of the effects of such measures in several health resorts in Poland with examples of similar actions undertaken in different periods in several health resorts in other European countries is the goal of this paper.It seems that representative examples of renovations of Polish health resorts returned to their heirs are Szczawnica and Solec Zdroj.Another group are spas located in the zone of big cities,such as Mateczny,regained by its owners,or Swoszowice in Cracow,which has been sold.This process looked different in case of health resort municipalisation,as in Rabka and Kryniea.Among foreign examples,an interesting one is certainly the health resort in Vichy,restored in the 1960s and 1970s,and then again in the 1990s,Aix-en-Provence,and a small spa in the Vosges.Obtained results of these comparisons authorise us to state imoortant sentences in conclusions.
机译:如今,有45个法定健康度假胜地,这意味着他们提供的治疗的条件和有效性由国家保障。加盟,几十个地点具有自然的药用资源,用于不同程度的地点。曾担任健康度假村在白球期间,第二次世界大战中不再履行这一功能。在全国境内运营的所有健康度假村都是国有化的,但在获得有关法规之前经营的所有保健度假村。在健康中进行的投资社会主义的度假胜地,许多这样的地方都受到过度的城市化,成为较大的城镇,人口超过一万,在别人中,休闲和旅游的功能正在同时开发,其中许多人承担了额外的行政职能,成为席位公社与县。在1989年重新获得独立性,致力于讨论o健康度假村待遇的形式和新的法律解决方案。在波兰健康度假村的可能形式的私有化形式推出了长期讨论。原则,它包括三个阶段,因此前业主的继承人开始重新获得他们的仅在21世纪初开始的性质。在1950年至1989年的不同商业实体和私有化的第一个私营企业期间,当销售单一卫生统计或休闲设施时,这些回报实际上提交了零件治疗设施或单一建筑物。热情地区,波兰健康度假村开始销往不同的商业实体和市政当局。前所有者,地方当局以及卫生度假村设施的新用户进行了各种适应,投资和装修。工作。他们专注于改善与健康度假村治疗的设施,设备和空间的质量,但他们也随着整个城镇或村庄的功能和审美吸引力的增加而与波兰的几个健康度假胜地的措施的效果相同,与其他欧洲其他国家的几个健康度假村的不同行动的例子是本文的目标。似乎返回其继承人的波兰健康度假村的装修的代表性例子是Szczawnica和Solec Zdroj.another Group是位于大城市区的水疗中心,如Mateczny,由其业主重新获得,或者克拉科夫的SwoSzowice已被售出。此过程在卫生度假村市中心的情况下看起来不同,如rabka和Kryniea.among外国的例子,一个有趣的是肯定是Vichy的健康度假村,于20世纪60年代和70年代恢复,然后再次在20世纪90年代,AIX-en-Provence和孚日的一个小水疗中心。这些比较的结果授权我们在结论中授权我们统一的罪名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号