首页> 外文会议>AMA Summer Academic Conference >The Role of Goal Orientations on Pro-Social vs.Pro-Self Spending Choices
【24h】

The Role of Goal Orientations on Pro-Social vs.Pro-Self Spending Choices

机译:目标方向对亲社会的作用。自我支出选择

获取原文

摘要

The present research examines the role of goal orientations(intrinsic vs.extrinsic)on consumer's pro-social vs.pro-self spending choices.We hypothesize that priming an intrinsic goal focus will influence consumers towards pro-social spending choices while inducing an extrinsic goal focus will increase the likelihood of making pro-self spending choices.Study 1 was an experimental survey collecting data from 211 university students.Participants were randomly allocated to an extrinsic or an intrinsic goal writing induction.Then,they were presented with a windfall scenario and were asked to freely describe how they would spend the money given.A researcher blinded to the hypothesis coded the descriptions as pro-social or pro-self.Forty-eight participants'descriptions(24%)were coded as pro-social spending choices.A chi-square test comparing the extrinsic vs.intrinsic manipulation with their pro-social vs.pro-self spending choice indicated that there were significant differences between the groups,yl(1)= 6.10,p =.014.Participants that completed the intrinsic manipulation(107 out of 201)were more likely to choose to spend money on someone else(n = 33)than participants in the extrinsic manipulation(n = 15).
机译:本研究探讨了目标取向(内在vs.extrinsic)对消费者的亲社会vs.pro-self支出选择的作用。我们假设启动内在的目标重点将影响消费者在诱导外在目标的同时对促进社会支出选择。焦点将增加制作亲自支出选择的可能性。研究所1是从211名大学生收集数据的实验调查。Participants被随机分配给外在或内在的目标写作感应。然后,他们被提出了意外收获的场景和被要求自由地描述他们将如何花钱。研究人员对假设的蒙蔽了编码的描述,作为亲社会或亲自我的描述。幸运 - 八个参与者的指标(24%)被编码为亲社会支出选择。与其亲社会vs.pro-self支出选择的外在vs.intrinsic操纵的Chi-square测试表明g之间存在显着差异ROUP,YL(1)= 6.10,p = .014.完成内在操纵的Particants(2010 of 2010)更有可能选择在其他人(n = 33)上的资金而不是外在操纵中的参与者(n = 15)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号