首页> 外文会议>SPIE Conference on Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/Gis Applications >Effects of sample size on burned areas accuracy estimates in the Amazon Basin
【24h】

Effects of sample size on burned areas accuracy estimates in the Amazon Basin

机译:样本量对亚马逊盆地烧伤区域精度估计的影响

获取原文

摘要

Remote sensing-derived maps contain errors. The magnitude of such errors is evaluated through accuracy assessment based on sub-sampling the total 'population' (i.e. map). Several strategies have been proposed to define the optimal sampling design leading to a statistically robust accuracy assessment. In this work, a stratified random sampling approach as proposed by Padilla et al.~1 was applied to validate two burned area (BA) products as part of the ESA's Firecci project: a SAR-based product generated from S1 data and the MODIS MCD64. The sampling design considers sample allocation as a function of burned area proportion inside each biome. In our study the sampling size was computed as suggested by Olofsson et al.~2. The objective of this study was to assess to which extent a reduction in the sampling size influences the accuracy metrics. The validation was carried out for BA detected from Sentinel-1 as well as a MODIS based-product, the MCD64, generated for the year 2017 in the Amazon region (8M km~2). The reference BA dataset was generated using optical time-series acquired by the Landsat-7 ETM+, Landsat-8 OLI, and Sentinel-2 MSI sensors. The BA products were validated three times: i) over n= 44 sample units (as computed from Olofsson et al.~2; ii) considering a sample size of n/2, and iii) considering a sample size of n/4, to test the sensitivity of the accuracy assessment to changes in the sample size over the tropics. The results showed that halving the sample size while maintaining the stratified allocation method, yielded similar results when compared to the original sample size (differences in OE and CE did not exceed 5% in any of the products, while differences in DC did not exceed 2%). For a sample size of n/4, the validation results were more unstable (differences in DC reached up to 9% and confidence intervals were higher). The results provide evidence for the optimal sampling size for the accuracy assessment of different BA products over the Amazon bas
机译:遥感派生地图包含错误。通过基于子采样总“群体”(即MAP)来评估这些误差的幅度。已经提出了几种策略来定义最佳采样设计,导致统计上稳健的准确性评估。在这项工作中,Padilla等人提出的分层随机抽样方法被应用于验证两个烧毁的区域(BA)产品,作为ESA的FireCCI项目的一部分:由S1数据和MODIS MCD64生成的基于SAR的产品。采样设计考虑样本分配作为每个生物群系内烧毁区域比例的函数。在我们研究中,按照Olofsson等人建议计算采样大小。〜2。本研究的目的是评估采样尺寸的减少程度,影响准确度指标。对从Sentinel-1检测到的BA以及亚马逊地区(8米km〜2)中生成的MCD64的MCD64进行了验证。使用由Landsat-7 ETM +,Landsat-8 Oli和Sentinel-2 MSI传感器获取的光学时间序列生成参考BA数据集。将BA产品经过验证三次:i)通过n = 44个样本单元(从Olofson等人计算,考虑到N / 4的样本大小,如N / 2,III)的样本大小,测试精度评估的灵敏度,以在热带地区的样本大小的变化。结果表明,与原始样本大小相比,在保持分层分配方法的同时,在保持分层分配方法的同时,产生类似的结果(OE和CE的差异在任何产品中没有超过5%,而DC的差异不超过2 %)。对于N / 4的样本量,验证结果更不稳定(DC差异达到9%,置信区间较高)。结果为亚马逊BAS上不同BA产品的准确评估提供了最佳采样尺寸的证据

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号