2 and H A Comparison of Controller Performances on the Ride Comfort of the Active Suspension System
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Control Engineering and Information Technology >A Comparison of Controller Performances on the Ride Comfort of the Active Suspension System
【24h】

A Comparison of Controller Performances on the Ride Comfort of the Active Suspension System

机译:控制器性能对主动悬架系统乘坐舒适性的比较

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, four state feedback controllers, namely skyhook, LQR, H2 and H, are designed for an active suspension system. The designed controllers are tested both via simulations and experiments on the active suspension set using a square bump, a sine bump and two random road profiles. The simulation results and the experimental results are compared for ride comfort, by post filtering the experimental results within the frequency range specified by the standard ISO 2631-1. The ride comfort analysis is done both via comparing the acceleration of the vehicle body and via comparing the jerk of the vehicle body. It has been shown that, skyhook controllers and LQR controllers are more suitable for bumps, regarding the ride comfort, and that they are not very suitable for the random road profiles. And it is also observed based on the experimental results that, H2 and H controllers are improving random road profiles with low toughness and are as good as the skyhook and LQR controllers for bumps, but that none of the mentioned controllers are improving random road profiles with high toughness, as expected by the simulation results.
机译:在本文中,四个国家反馈控制器,即Skyhook,LQR,H 2 和H.,专为主动悬架系统而设计。通过使用方形凸块,正弦凸块和两个随机公路型材,通过模拟和实验测试设计的控制器。将仿真结果和实验结果进行了比较,通过在标准ISO 2631-1规定的频率范围内过滤实验结果。通过比较车身的加速度和通过比较车身的速度来进行乘坐舒适性分析。已经表明,在乘坐舒适性的情况下,Skyhook控制器和LQR控制器更适合颠簸,并且它们并不适合随机公路型材。还基于实验结果观察,H 2 和H. 控制器正在改善具有低韧性的随机公路型材,与Skyhook和LQR控制器一样好,但是由于模拟结果预期,所提到的控制器都没有提高随机公路型材,因此通过模拟结果预期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号