A hypothesis of the Effect of a New Nasal Spray Made from Natural Medicines on Allergic Rhinitis in Animals

摘要

To verify the effect of a new nasal spray made from natural medicines on allergic rhinitis in animals. Methods: The main natural medicines contained in Acusine nasal spray plus essential traditional Chinese medicine contained in drugs for allergic rhinitis in Chinese market were used. By preparation process of extraction of traditional Chinese medicine such as steam distillation, ethanol extraction, a new nasal spray made from natural medicines was prepared. In the meantime, 24 B ALB/c mice and New Zealand white rabbits were used. Then, mice were randomly divided into four group; control group, beclomethasone dipropionate group, Acusine group and new spray group, 6 mice in each group. Moreover, the effect of the new nasal spray made on passive cutaneous anaphylaxis was conducted by detecting absorptions of Evan's blue (620nm) in the four groups. Allergic rhinitis models in 40 New Zealand white rabbits were established. Consequently, 40 allergic rhinitis models in rabbits were randomly divided into control group, Acusine group and new spray group, 10 rabbits in each group. The four groups were sprayed nasally with saline, Acusine spray and new spray respectively, three times/d, for 30 days. The nasal resistances in the four groups were measured with a rhinoresistometcr. Moreover, their nasal mucosa was taken for HE staining. Consequently, their pathological manifestations were observed. The results: Absorption of Evan's blue (620nm) of new spray group will be found significantly lower than Acusine group (P<0.05) and will have no significantly difference compared with beclomethasone dipropionate group(P>0.05). On the other hand, absorption of Evan's blue (620nm) of beclomethasone dipropionate group will be significantly lower than Acusine group (P<0.05). Moreover, The nasal resistances of new spray group will be significantly lower than Acusine group (P<0.05) and will have no significantly difference compared with beclomethasone dipropionate group (P>0.05). Moreover, the nasal resistances of beclomethasone dipropionate group will be significantly lower than Acusine group (P<0.05). While, the nasal mucosa of control group will be found typical as nasal mucosa of allergic rhinitis. However, the nasal mucosa of beclomethasone dipropionate group, Acusine group and new spray group will be better than control group. Of them, new spray group will be the best. The nasal mucosa of beclomethasone dipropionate group will show the manifestation of drug-induced rhinitis. The conclusion: The invented new spray will not only have a better treatment effect on allergic rhinitis, similar with beclomethasone dipropionate, than Acusine Nasal Spray but also will not leave side effect on nasal mucosa, compared with beclomethasone dipropionate. Thus, the new spray made from natural medicines can be further studied as a better prescription drug, rather than an OTC like Acusine Nasal Spray, to replace beclomethasone dipropionate nasal spray. However, further study that would be required to produce a more meaningful answer.