首页> 外文会议>SAE Intelligent and Connected Vehicles Symposium >The Development of Safety Cases for an Autonomous Vehicle: A Comparative Study on Different Methods
【24h】

The Development of Safety Cases for an Autonomous Vehicle: A Comparative Study on Different Methods

机译:自主车辆安全案例的开发:不同方法的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

The Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) promise huge economic, social and environmental benefits. The autonomous vehicles supposed to be safer than human drivers. However, the advanced systems and complex levels of automation could also bring accidents by tiny faults of hardware or errors of software. To achieve complete safety, a safety case providing guidance on the identification and classification of hazardous events, and the minimization of these risks needs to be developed throughout the entire development lifecycle process of CAVs. A comprehensible and valid safety case has to employ appropriate safety approaches complying with the automotive functional safety requirements in ISO 26262. The technical focus of present work is on the comparative study of different safety approaches, in particular, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method and Goal Structuring Notation (GSN) method that have been employed to generate lists of hazardous events, safety goals and functional safety requirements at the vehicle level. A case study on the safety case development of INISIGHT autonomous vehicle has been carried out using the aforementioned methods. This case study covers the safety argument of battery and charging system that supply the whole electric power for INSIGHT vehicle. The safety of this systems has been assessed along with their potential for malfunction together with the layers of protection. The results and conclusions from case study analyses suggest the safety case of CAVs can be developed in a highly effective manner by employing a combined method of GSN and FMEA.
机译:连接和自主车辆(CAVE)承诺巨大的经济,社会和环境效益。自动车辆应该比人类司机更安全。但是,先进的系统和复杂的自动化水平也可以通过硬件的微小故障或软件错误带来事故。为了实现完整的安全,为危险事件的鉴定和分类提供指导的安全案例,并且需要在整个开发的脉冲的整个开发生命周期过程中开发这些风险的最小化。可理解和有效的安全案例必须采用符合ISO 26262中的汽车功能安全要求的适当安全方法。目前工作的技术焦点是对不同安全方法的比较研究,特别是失效模式和效果分析(FMEA)已经用于生成危险事件列表,安全目标和车辆水平的功能安全要求的方法和目标结构符号(GSN)方法。采用上述方法进行了对无用途自治车辆的安全壳开发的案例研究。本案例研究涵盖了电池和充电系统的安全性论,供应洞察力的整体电力。该系统的安全性已经过分评估以及它们与保护层的故障潜力。案例研究分析的结果和结论表明,通过采用GSN和FMEA的组合方法,可以以高效的方式开发脉冲的安全性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号