首页> 外文会议>SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition >A Cost-Effective Evaluation of Pods Diversion Effectiveness using FiberOptics DAS and DTS
【24h】

A Cost-Effective Evaluation of Pods Diversion Effectiveness using FiberOptics DAS and DTS

机译:使用光纤DAS和DTS对PODS引流效果的经济有效评估

获取原文

摘要

Diversion has been widely promoted as a technology that can both,lower the cost and increase the efficiencyof plug-and-perforating completions(PnP).There are many diversion materials and techniques availabletoday including; balls,chemicals,etc.A new product,informally referred as”pods”consisting of knotteddegradable fibers delivered in a capsule,has gained significant interest within the industry.We tested this new diversion material,”pods”,in four stages in one of our wells instrumented with afiber optic cable deployed behind casing.The FO results clearly showed that although perforations wereplugged following”pods”deployment,the diagnostics also revealed that the outcome was not the desiredone,which is to divert a portion of the treatment to understimulated clusters.In all the stages tested,thematerial did not re-open screened-out clusters.Furthermore,the frac placement distribution effectivenesswas worse after the deployment of the diverter material.All the tested stages showed the expected treatment pressure increase at the surface corresponding to the”pods”blocking some of the perforations.It is important to highlight that in the absence of downhole FOtechnology all these tests would have been categorized as successful.However,when the number of”pods”was increased to try to improve their performance,we ended up blocking so many perforations that thestimulation could not continue due to pressure limitations.This integrated approach toward the testing ofthis new technology demonstrated that there was a clear downside risk in utilizing this diversion technologyin many wells without a full understanding of how this diverter material was interacting downhole with theclusters and perforations.The paper highlights the pitfalls and risks of relying on a single diagnostic tool(surface treatment pressure)to evaluate emerging technologies.Fundamentally,there are two ways to empirically test new completion designs and stimulationtechnologies: Production-only-Pilots(PoP)and Integrated-Frac-Diagnostics-Pilots(IFDP).While betterPnP efficiency is not the only intended use for”pods”,the IFDP approach and FO monitoring used in thistest has enabled a rapid and cost-effective testing of this technology application at a fraction of the costand time of a PoP test.
机译:转移已被广泛推广为一种技术,可以降低成本并提高插头孔化完井(PNP)的效率。有许多转移材料和技术可用性地段,包括;球,化学品等。新产品,非正式地称为“荚”,它由在胶囊中递送的Knotteddegrapherable纤维组成,在行业中获得了显着的兴趣。我们在其中一阶段测试了这一新的转移材料,“豆荚”。我们的井有旁边的光缆部署在壳体后面。结果清楚地表明,虽然在“吊舱”部署之后持续的穿孔,但诊断也揭示了结果不是所通后的,这是将一部分治疗转移到化学簇中的后果。在所有测试的阶段,整体材料没有重新打开屏蔽簇。在进行分流器材料后,Furtimore,FRAC放置分配有效性越来越差。所有测试阶段显示了对应的表面上的预期处理压力增加“荚”阻挡了一些穿孔。重要的是要强调,在没有井下Fotechnology的情况下,所有这些测试都将是Catego尽可能成功。然而,当“豆荚”的数量增加以提高他们的表现时,我们最终阻止了这么多的穿孔,因为压力限制,该模拟不能继续。这是对新技术进行测试的综合方法证明了这一点利用这种转移技术有明确的下行风险,在许多井上没有完全了解这种转向器材料如何与灯罩和穿孔相互作用。本文突出了依赖于单一诊断工具(表面处理压力)的陷阱和风险评估新兴的技术。完全,有两种方法可以经验测试新的完成设计和刺激技术:仅限生产的飞行员(POP)和集成的FRAC-DIPATOSTICS-PILOTS(IFDP).WHLEELEDPNP效率不是“ PODS“,IFDP方法和最近使用的MON监测使得对该技术的快速和经济高效的测试GY应用于POP测试的颂歌时间的一小部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号