首页> 外文会议>SPE Asia Pacific Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Social Responsibility Conference >Asset-Level Social Performance in Conflict Areas Frontier Markets; Doable or Doomsday Scenario
【24h】

Asset-Level Social Performance in Conflict Areas Frontier Markets; Doable or Doomsday Scenario

机译:冲突地区和前沿市场的资产级社会表现;可行的或世界末日的情景

获取原文

摘要

For many managers, social performance is still viewed as a slightly unfamiliar topic that is unrelated to business objectives, not always strategically implemented, and best left to a specialized department. The assumption behind this view is that since social performance (incorrectly) only deals with people's behavior, it is often unpredictable, if not at times outright irrational, and therefore difficult to manage. This view is prevalent in business management in general; however an additional layer of complexity comes into play when a company is operating within an area of conflict. Such a context can add a more acute sense of powerlessness, leading to a wide spectrum of company responses, ranging from adopting a wait-and-see approach, to addressing conflict dynamics through community investment efforts, to relying heavily on security provisions. Throughout this paper we will be distinguishing between macro-level conflict in the broader jurisdictions of a context of operations, on one hand, and conflict dynamics at an asset level, on the other. Companies have difficulties making this distinction. As a result, they deploy approaches that are re-active and focus on management of the manifestations of conflict rather than to take a more pro-active approach based on an understanding of the macro-level context in which they operate. At best this leads to missed opportunities, but more often results in heightened risk exposure for the company. The objective of this paper will be to demonstrate that Oil & Gas (O&G) companies with operations in areas of conflict actually have much more control over their socio-political risk exposure at an asset level than they generally assume. Gaining this control will require an asset-level social-performance plan that is informed by an analysis of underlying root causes, and serviced by a well-implemented integrated approach that, at a minimum, is focused on avoiding preventable mistakes.
机译:对于许多经理来说,社会绩效仍被视为与业务目标无关的略微不熟悉的话题,并不总是战略性地实施,最好的留给专业部门。这种观点背后的假设是,自社交业绩(错误地)仅处理人们的行为,往往是不可预测的,如果不是有时彻头彻尾的非理性,因此难以管理。这一观点在业务管理中普遍存在一般;然而,当公司在冲突领域运行时,额外的复杂性层次发挥作用。这样的背景可以增加更锐度的无能为力,导致广泛的公司反应,从采用观看和看法,通过社区投资努力解决冲突动态,依赖于安全规定。在本文中,我们将在另一方面,在另一方面,在一方面,在一方面的宏观级别冲突之间进行宏观级别冲突,并在资产水平处发生冲突动态。公司难以实现这种区别。因此,它们部署了重新主动的方法,并专注于管理冲突的表现,而不是基于对他们运作的宏观级背景的理解来采取更积极的方法。尽可能导致错过机会,但更常常导致公司风险敞口的风险暴露。本文的目的是证明,在冲突地区的业务的石油和天然气(O&G)公司实际上可以控制其在资产水平的社会政治风险暴露中的控制比通常假设。获得这种控制将需要一个资产级的社会绩效计划,以通过潜在的根本原因进行分析,并通过精心实施的综合方法服务,最低限度旨在避免预防犯错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号