首页> 外文会议>World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium >A Cool Urban Island Change 1990 -2014. Comparative Bioclimatic Analysis in a Desert Climate, the Case of Antofagasta City Square
【24h】

A Cool Urban Island Change 1990 -2014. Comparative Bioclimatic Analysis in a Desert Climate, the Case of Antofagasta City Square

机译:一座酷的城市岛屿改变1990 -2014。对着沙漠气候的比较生物对比分析,antofagasta城市广场的情况

获取原文

摘要

This article proposes to make a comparative bioclimatic analysis from 1990 to 2014 of the main square of Antofagasta, a coastal desert city in Chile, which was remodelled in 1995, and shows how the redesigning of green areas affects the microclimatic conditions and thermal comfort of the urban space. Ex ante measurements dating 1990 were compared with ex post results from 2014. Data were obtained in both cases in the month of September at different times of a day and in different climate conditions. The variables studied were: land surface temperature, humidity, wind speed, amount of light and square use frequency inside the square and in surrounding streets. The temperatures are not statistically different during the years 1990 and 2014 for the city of Antofagasta. The main layout of the square has not changed, and inside the square it is similar for both periods, but new species were introduced and bigger trees with shadow projection were cut down. The square had a micro-climate role in 2014 as well as in 1990. The highest frequency zone with an important surface lost it is comfort thermic condition with an increase of 1°C. Other smaller zones with less relevance for users gained in cooling with a Q.5°C reduction. The new design has been detrimental to the intensity of its micro climatic regulatory function affecting the thermic comfort of the square's internal spaces, especially those formerly protected by shadow, which mitigate a high solar radiation. The study results suggest that bio-climatic analysis of public open spaces is a key component for the design of future projects as a heat mitigating tool in the context of climate change. Research question is: How does the redesign of the square impact a cool urban island and the thermic comfort of users? Significant differences between data in situ collected in 1990 and 2014. Thermal comfort was negatively affected by the redesign in the square. The square is still a cool island but with less strength.
机译:本文提出从1995年的沿海沙漠城市沿海沙漠城市南·南·南·安托法加斯塔的大广场进行比较生物对比分析,该城市于1995年被改造,并展示了绿色区域的重新设计如何影响微跨度条件和热舒适性城市空间。与2014年的前后结果进行比较了1990年的前左右测量。在九月的两种情况下,在一天中的不同时间和不同气候条件下获得数据。所研究的变量是:陆地表面温度,湿度,风速,光线和方形在广场内的频率和周围的街道。对于1990年和2014年,温度与南·安托法塔塔市的温度没有统计不同。正方形的主要布局没有改变,并且在平方内部相似,这两个时段都是相似的,但介绍了新物种,并削减了带阴影投影的更大的树木。该广场在2014年的微观气候作用以及1990年。最高频率的区域损失的最高频率区是舒适的热条件,增加1°C。其他较小的区域,对于用Q.5°C的冷却中获得的用户的相关性较小。新的设计对其微气候监管功能的强度影响了平方的内部空间的热舒适度,特别是那些以前受阴影保护的舒适性,这减轻了高太阳辐射。研究结果表明,公共开放空间的生物气候分析是在气候变化背景下为未来项目设计的关键组成部分。研究问题是:广场的重新设计如何影响凉爽的城市岛屿和热情的用户? 1990年和2014年的原位数据之间数据之间的显着差异。通过广场重新设计的热舒适性受到负面影响。广场仍然是一个凉爽的岛屿,但实力较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号