首页> 外文会议>POWER-GEN Europe Renewable Energy World Europe >AFTER MATH OF THE LIGNITE POWER PLANTS PRIVATIZATION POLICY OF TURKEY UNDER CONSIDERATION OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT - 2015
【24h】

AFTER MATH OF THE LIGNITE POWER PLANTS PRIVATIZATION POLICY OF TURKEY UNDER CONSIDERATION OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT - 2015

机译:在审议巴黎协议时,土耳其电厂的血褐化电厂私有化政策 - 2015年

获取原文

摘要

Turkey has undertaken several policies since the 1970’s to utilize its Lignite reserves. Various technologies have been considered and implemented throughout 4 decades. In the beginning the state owned power generation company was commissioned to invest in such power plants. In the 1990’s to 2000’s the role was passed to the private sector, but without much success. After the banking crisis in 2001 and the restructuring of the banking system with the guidance of the IMF, the account deficit and dependence on Russia sourced natural gas was brought front, thus Lignite utilization policies were told to be essential. The market paradigms where barely supporting this vision, thus the private sector didn’t pay much attention to this hard to burn fuel. But policies where enforced. Along the same time line Global energy policies turned severely towards the supporting the renewable energy sources (RES). As a result of the evolution in RES technologies, their efficiencies, CAPEX and OPEX costs and viable subvention schemes the market share of RES sourced electricity increased from 20% to 44%. Further triggered by the global economical and local stagnation the market paradigms changed (power and cleaner coal prices turned down) and made the Lignite fuelled power plant (“LCPP”) investments totally none viable. Thus the Turkish Government recently introduced harsh subvention methods to support the LCPP investments to the disadvantage of the cleaner imported steam coal thermal power plant technologies. With its 80 GW power generation capacity Turkey’s energy policies with their controversy to the COP 21 outcomes, become an interesting topic to look at. This paper will evaluate and evaluate the question ‘Are Lignite subvention policies sustainable from an economical and environmental perspective?’ and ‘Are there other possibilities to solve the economic and social burden of the Lignite mining sector and related power plants?’.
机译:自1970年以来,土耳其已经进行了几项政策,以利用其褐煤储备。在整个4年内被考虑并实施了各种技术。在开始,国有发电公司被委托投资这种电厂。在1990年代到2000年,该角色将传递给私营部门,但没有太大成功。在2001年银行危机和银行系统的重组与国际货币基金组织的指导下,账户赤字和依赖于俄罗斯源泉的天然气,因此褐煤利用政策被告知至关重要。市场范式几乎没有支持这一愿景,因此私营部门并没有关注这难以燃烧燃料。但强制执行的政策。沿着同一时间线,全球能源政策严重转向支持可再生能源(RES)。由于RES技术的演变,他们的效率,资本支出和OPEX成本和可行的补助计划RES采购电力的市场份额从20%增加到44%。进一步引发了全球经济和本地停滞的市场范式改变(权力和清洁煤炭价格逆转)并使褐煤燃料发电厂(“LCPP”)投资完全没有可行的投资。因此,土耳其政府最近推出了苛刻的补助方法,以支持LCPP投资对进口蒸汽煤热电厂技术的劣势。由于其80 GW发电能力,土耳其的能源政策与缔约方会议21成果争议,成为一个有趣的话题。本文将评估和评估问题'是一种从经济和环境视角可持续的褐煤补助政策吗?“和”还有其他可能性来解决褐煤矿业和相关电厂的经济和社会负担?“。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号