首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress Experience >Gasoline Fuels Assessment for Delphi’s Second Generation Gasoline Direct-Injection Compression Ignition (GDCI) Multi-Cylinder Engine
【24h】

Gasoline Fuels Assessment for Delphi’s Second Generation Gasoline Direct-Injection Compression Ignition (GDCI) Multi-Cylinder Engine

机译:汽油燃料评估Delphi第二代汽油直喷压缩点火点(GDCI)多缸发动机

获取原文

摘要

Fuel efficiency and emission performance sensitivity to fuel reactivity was examined using Delphi’s second-generation Gasoline Direct-Injection Compression Ignition (Gen 2.0 GDCI) multi-cylinder engine. The study was designed to compare a US market gasoline (RON 92 E10) to a higher reactivity gasoline (RON 80) at four operating conditions ranging from light load of 800 rpm / 2.0 bar gross indicated-mean-effective pressure (IMEPg) to medium load of 2000 rpm / 10.0 bar IMEPg. The experimental assessment indicated that both gasolines could achieve good performance and Tier 3 emission targets at each of the four operating conditions. Relative to the RON 92 E10 gasoline, better fuel consumption and engine-out emissions performance was achieved when using RON 80 gasoline; consistent with our previously reported single-cylinder engine research [1]. More specifically, a fuel consumption improvement was observed at the low load operating conditions (800 rpm / 2.0 bar IMEPg and 2000 rpm / 2.6 bar IMEPg) when using the RON 80 gasoline, compared to using market RON 92 E10 gasoline mainly due to better combustion stability that is directly associated with the fuel’s higher reactivity. For mid-load operation (1500 rpm / 6.0 bar IMEPg and 2000 rpm / 10.0 bar IMEPg), significantly lower fuel consumption was achieved when using the higher reactivity (RON 80) gasoline due to significantly lower boost pressure requirements and an enhanced combustion process. Clear differences in low temperature heat release (LTHR) behavior for this partially premixed compression ignition (PPCI) combustion process was also observed between the two gasolines. Specifically for the Delphi Gen 2.0 GDCI multi-cylinder engine, fuel consumption and engine-out emission targets were able to achieve when using both current market RON 92 E10 gasoline and a higher reactivity RON 80 gasoline. Furthermore, the higher reactivity RON 80 gasoline exhibited further improvement of light-to-medium load performance and emissions.
机译:使用Delphi的第二代汽油直喷压缩点火(Gen 2.0 GDCI)多缸发动机检查燃料效率和发射性能对燃料反应性的敏感性。该研究旨在将美国市场汽油(RON 92 E10)与较高的反应性汽油(RON 80)进行比较,在400 rpm / 2.0巴克总指示均值(IMEPG)的光负荷为中等负载2000 rpm / 10.0 bar imepg。实验评估表明,两种汽油都可以在四个操作条件下实现良好的性能和三级排放目标。相对于RON 92 E10汽油,在使用RON 80汽油时,实现了更好的燃料消耗和发动机排放性能;与我们先前报道的单缸发动机研究[1]一致。更具体地说,在低负荷操作条件下观察到燃料消耗改善(800rpm / 2.0 bar imepg和2000rpm / 2.6 bar imepg)使用RON 80汽油,与使用市场RON 92 E10汽油相比,主要是由于更好的燃烧与燃料更高的反应性直接相关的稳定性。对于中负载操作(1500 RPM / 6.0 BAR IMEPG和2000 RPM / 10.0 BAR IMEPG),由于使用较高的反应性(RON 80)汽油而显着降低燃料消耗,由于显着降低了升压压力要求和增强的燃烧过程。在两种汽油之间也观察到该两种汽油之间的低温热释放(LTh)燃烧过程的低温热释放(LTHR)行为的差异。特别是对于Delphi Gen 2.0 GDCI多缸发动机,燃料消耗和发动机排放目标能够在使用当前市场RON 92 E10汽油和更高的反应性RON 80汽油时实现。此外,较高的反应性RON 80汽油表现出进一步改善光到介质负载性能和排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号