1.Applications of the Chippewas of Thames First Notion v.Enbridge Pipelines Inc., 2015 and the Supreme Court of Canada's decision on seismic testing in Baffin Bay 2.Contemplate conduct that might adversely impact Tredty rights as seen in HaIda Nafibn v. British Columbia, 2004, Taku River Tingf First Nation v. British Columbia, 2004, Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada, 2005 3.Upcoming developments in Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia and how religious freedoms are handled 4.Anticipate decisions from the First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun et at v Government of Yukon and what it means to honour the spirit of a treaty
展开▼
机译:1.泰晤士的Chippewas Prive V.Enbridge Pipelines Inc.,2015年和加拿大最高法院的葡萄干湾在玻璃湾的地震检测决定中的决定2.在海边Nafibn诉中可能产生不利影响的人的行为。不列颠哥伦比亚省,2004年,Taku River Tingf First Nation v。不列颠哥伦比亚省,2004年,MikiSew Cree First Nation v。加拿大,2005年3.克鲁克萨国家的发展发展诉讼。不列颠哥伦比亚省(不列颠哥伦比亚省)和宗教自由如何处理宗教自由。 Nacho Nyak Dun et在育空的v政府,它意味着纪念条约的精神
展开▼