首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Deep and High Stress Minin >The optimisation and comparison of re-entry assessment methodologies for use in seismically active mines
【24h】

The optimisation and comparison of re-entry assessment methodologies for use in seismically active mines

机译:地震活动矿山使用重新进入评估方法的优化与比较

获取原文

摘要

The hazard posed from large seismic events is often high enough to warrant the exclusion or evacuation of personnel from underground workings. A period of exclusion is often determined following blasts or large events due to the increased risk. The period of exclusion until re-entry occurs is a decision for site geotechnical engineers and mine management that must balance the potential risk to personnel with lost production time and associated costs. There is currently no widely accepted method for determining re-entry times and mine sites typically develop their own rules for exclusions after blasts and large events. A systematic and evidence based approach to the development of re-entry protocols could potentially reduce the risk to personnel from an early re-entry or reduce the lost production from an unnecessary exclusion. Four methods of re-entry assessment have been considered in this paper. The seismic responses at three mines have been modelled and used to optimise each assessment method and gauge the relative success through back-analysis. These same technigues are available for other mines to review their own data and potentially improve their current re-entry protocols. The results of this research indicate that a real-time re-entry assessment method can offer improved outcomes compared to blanket re-entry rules by reducing the average exclusion time while still capturing the same number of large events. The incorporation of event size in the assessment can result in better results than the event count. Vallejos and McKinnon (2009) developed a probabilistic framework for re-entry assessment but this method was found to be less efficient than the blanket rule in the majority of cases in this study. The method would also result in more administration and uncertainty for mine planning and scheduling. Several potential improvements to the analysis technigues, and avenues for further research, have been discussed.
机译:大型地震事件提出的危险往往足够高,以保证从地下运作的人员排除或疏散。由于风险增加,通常在爆炸或大事件之后确定一段排斥。排除期间,直到重新入境发生是现场岩土工程师和矿山管理的决定,必须将潜在风险与损失的生产时间和相关成本平衡。目前没有广泛接受的方法来确定重新入口时间,矿场地区通常在爆炸和大事件之后开发自己的规则。基于系统和证据的进入议定书的发展方法可能会使人员从早期重新入境或减少不必要的排除损失的人员来降低人员的风险。本文已经考虑了四种重新进入评估方法。三种地雷的地震反应已经建模并用于优化每种评估方法,并通过背部分析来衡量相对成功。这些相同的技术可用于其他地雷来审查自己的数据,并可能提高他们当前的重新进入协议。该研究的结果表明,通过减少平均排除时间,实时重新进入评估方法可以在仍然捕获相同数量的大事件时,与毯子重新进入规则相比,可以提供改进的结果。在评估中的事件大小的纳入可能会导致比事件数量更好的结果。 Vallejos和McKinnon(2009)开发了一种用于重新进入评估的概率框架,但发现这种方法比本研究大多数病例中的毯子规则较低。该方法还将导致矿山规划和调度的更多管理和不确定性。已经讨论了分析技术的几种潜在改进,以及进一步研究的途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号