首页> 外文会议>South East Asia Development Research International Conference >The Analysis on the Quality of Test Items of the Summative Test
【24h】

The Analysis on the Quality of Test Items of the Summative Test

机译:总结试验试验项目质量分析

获取原文

摘要

This study aimed to determine the quality of grains from the Final Exam of Junior High School, in Balangan Regency subjects Citizenship Education Year 2015/2016, which is indicated from the level of difficulty, discriminator index, and the effectiveness of the distractors. The subjects of the study were 200 students of junior high schools in Balangan Regency. The objects of the study were 50 summative tests items and the answer key. The data from documentation were analyzed by deploying the ANATES program version 4.1.0 to investigate the item difficulty, discriminator index, and the effectiveness of the distractors. The findings of the analysis revealed that: (1) based on the level of difficulty, there were 23 very easy items (46%), 11 easy items (22%), and 16 medium items (32%); (2) based on item discrimination, 21 items (42%) were categorized as poor discriminator, 16 items (32%) were categorized as fair discriminator, 11 items were categorized as good discriminator, and 2 items were categorized as very good discriminator; (3) based on the effectiveness of the distractor, functioned poorly was 12 items (24%), fair distractors are 16 items (32%), good distractors are 13 items (26%), and very good distractors are 9 points (18%).
机译:本研究旨在确定初中考试的谷物的质量,在巴兰南丽晶受试者公民教育年度2015/2016年,这是从难度,判别员指数和分散人的有效性的表明。该研究的主题是巴兰南·丽晶初中的200名学生。该研究的对象是50个Subsative测试项目和答案密钥。通过部署anate程序4.1.0来分析文档的数据,以调查物品难度,鉴别者指数和分散组的有效性。分析结果显示:(1)基于难度水平,有23项非常易于物品(46%),11个容易物品(22%)和16个中等项目(32%); (2)基于项目歧视,将21项(42%)分类为差距,16项(32%)分类为公平鉴别者,将11项分类为良好的鉴别者,2个项目被分类为非常好的鉴别者; (3)根据令人沮丧的效果,功能不佳为12件(24%),公平的分心剂是16件物品(32%),良好的分心剂是13件(26%),非常好的干扰者是9分(18 %)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号