首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Movement, Health and Exercise >Comparison between Stair Climbing and 1 Mile Walking in Relation to Cardiorespiratory Fitness among Sedentary Adults
【24h】

Comparison between Stair Climbing and 1 Mile Walking in Relation to Cardiorespiratory Fitness among Sedentary Adults

机译:楼梯攀岩与1英里的比较与久坐成年人中的心肺健身关系

获取原文

摘要

Background: The worldwide epidemic of physical inactivity is rising significantly and the main cause is a sedentary lifestyle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of stair climbing and 1 mile walking in relation to cardiorespiratory response and to estimate the V02max and Physical Fitness Index (PFI). Methods: PAR-Q and IPAQ were used to assess the level of physical activity and sedentary status of participants. 37 participants were initially assessed for their maximal oxygen uptake (V02 max) and physical fitness index (PFI) using modified Harvard step test after randomly assigning them into 3 groups. Only 34 participants completed the study; 12 Full stair climbing, 11 half stair climbing, and 11 one mile walking. Full stair climbing group ascended 7 stories of 154 steps, each step 17.5cm in height (vertical distance =27m), whereas half stair climbing group ascended 3.5 stories of 77 steps (vertical distance =13.5m) and 1-mile walk group walked for 1 mile on the treadmill without any inclination. V02max, PFI, heart rate recovery and rate of perceived exertion were measured at baseline and at the end of week 4. Results: Repeated measures 2 way ANOVA was used to find the differences between 3 groups. Full stair climbing group showed an increase in V02 max and 1-mile walking group exhibited improvement in HRR. Conclusion: 1-mile walking group and full stair climbing groups exhibited improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness. Full stair climbing group took less than 2 minutes and 1-mile walking group took 11 to 14 minutes to complete the exercise, hence one can opt to perform either stair climbing or walking depending on their preference to improve cardiorespiratory fitness.
机译:背景:身体活动造成的全球疫情显著上升,主要原因是久坐的生活方式。这项研究的目的是评估爬楼梯有1英里行走的有效性相对于心肺反应,估计最大VO和体质指数(PFI)。方法:PAR-Q和IPAQ被用来评估身体活动和参与者的地位久坐的水平。 37名参与者被初步评估用于使用改进型哈佛步骤试验后随机地分配它们分为3组其最大摄氧量(V02 max)和体质指数(PFI)。只有34参与者完成了研究; 12全爬楼梯,11半爬楼梯,以及111英里行走。全爬楼梯组上升的154个步骤中,在高度(竖直距离=27米)各步骤17.5厘米7层,而半爬楼梯组升到3.5楼层77个步骤(垂直距离=13.5米)和1英里长的组步行1英里没有任何倾斜的跑步机。重复测量2因素ANOVA用于发现3组之间的差异:最大VO 2,PFI,心脏速率回收和主观体力的速率在基线和周结束4.结果测量。全爬楼梯组显示在HRR最大V02的增加和1英里行走组表现出的改善。结论:1英里的步行小组和全爬楼梯群体表现出心肺功能的改善。全爬楼梯组花了不到2分钟,1英里的步行小组花了11到14分钟就可以完成的运动,因此,人们可以选择根据自己的喜好,以改善心肺功能执行或者爬楼梯或步行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号