首页> 外文会议>North American Society for Trenchless Technology no-dig show >A Quantitative Comparison between Trenchless Technology and Open-Cut Method
【24h】

A Quantitative Comparison between Trenchless Technology and Open-Cut Method

机译:挖井技术与开割方法的定量比较

获取原文

摘要

For years open cut excavation has remained the primary method of utility installation across the world. The technical complexity and high capital costs associated with specialized tunneling equipment primarily limited tunneling efforts to large diameter transportation projects and mining efforts. Recent advances in trenchless methods have shown trenchless techniques, such as horizontal directional drilling and micro-tunneling, to be economically advantageous to traditional open cut methods. Risks associated with open cut utility installation have traditionally been considered easier to manage than those associated with trenchless options. Open cut operations are easier to adapt to unanticipated subsurface conditions and the industry’s experience with traditional bypass, cut and repair of crossing and conflicting utilities is well established. Trenchless methods however, require additional subsurface exploration and geotechnical monitoring to mitigate risks associated with utility/structure settlement, soil blow out, clogging of spoil return lines, unanticipated subsurface conditions and the avoidance of unpassable obstructions.
机译:多年来,开放式切割挖掘仍然是世界各地的公用事业安装方法。与专业隧道设备相关的技术复杂性和高资本成本主要限于隧道掘进努力,大直径运输项目和采矿努力。近牙线方法的最新进展已经显示出恒星技术,例如水平定向钻孔和微隧道,在经济上对传统的开放式切割方法是有利的。传统上,与开放式公用事业安装相关的风险被认为比与与粗型选项相关联的人更容易。开放式削减操作更容易适应意外的地下条件,并且行业的传统旁路的经验,切断和跨越公用事业的削减和修复是很好的。然而,挖沟方法需要额外的地下勘探和岩土监测,以减轻与效用/结构沉降,土壤排斥,破坏返回线的堵塞,意外的地下条件以及避免无法普遍的障碍物相关的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号