首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications >A Cost Comparison for Open-Cut and Trenchless Method in City Natural Gas Pipeline Network
【24h】

A Cost Comparison for Open-Cut and Trenchless Method in City Natural Gas Pipeline Network

机译:城市天然气管网明渠无沟法成本比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The present work aims at cost comparison of open cut method with the trenchless method that uses Horizontal Direction Drilling. The use of trenchless method is significantly increasing over open cut method. The execution cost of laying network is sum of cost of laying pipeline and cost of restoration of surface. Due to reducing cost of laying network by trenchless method, the reduction in cost of laying has gone down by 50 percent in last six years 2011 -2017 by trenchless method.There are five type of surfaces viz Normal Soil, Brick on edged soling, Cement concrete road, Interlocking tile road and Bituminous road are found in city gas pipeline network . The restoration charge for all the surfaces remained unchanged for last six years i.e, 2011 to 2017. This work includes cost comparison of pipeline laying network for all five type of surfaces in both open cut and trenchless method......
机译:目前的工作旨在将开挖法与使用水平方向钻探的非开挖法进行成本比较。与开挖方法相比,无沟槽方法的使用显着增加。敷设网络的执行成本是敷设管线成本和表面修复成本之和。由于通过非开挖方法降低了铺设网络的成本,因此在2011年至2017年的六年中,通过非开挖方法降低了铺设成本的比例下降了50%。有五种类型的表面,即普通土壤,带边底砖,水泥在城市燃气管网中发现了混凝土路,连锁瓦路和沥青路。在过去的六年(即2011年至2017年)内,所有表面的修复费用保持不变。这项工作包括采用开挖法和非开挖法比较所有五种表面的管道铺设网络的成本……

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号