首页> 外文会议>International Peat Congress >HAZE CONTROL AND THE OIL PALM FARMER- A REVIEW OF POLICY OPTIONS
【24h】

HAZE CONTROL AND THE OIL PALM FARMER- A REVIEW OF POLICY OPTIONS

机译:阴霾控制和石油棕榈农民 - 审查政策选择

获取原文

摘要

Southeast Asia has arguably seen the worst-ever, certainly the longest, peat-driven haze-smoke pollution between September and November 2015. Over 100,000 fires have burned some two million hectares, apparently worsened by El Nino climatic conditions and the Indonesian electoral cycle. Some 43 million Indonesians were exposed to toxic smog in Kalimantan and Sumatra. Neighbouring countries also endured the haze-smoke drift. This decades-old problem erupted in August 1997, presumably for the expansion of oil palm and other cash crops. This led the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to sign the 2002 Transboundary Haze Pollution Agreement (ratified by Indonesia in 2014). It gave rise to the Europe-led non-government organisation (NGO) movement for sustainable palm oil. Despite these measures, the problem recurs yearly. We examine the political-economy of the sources and solutions of the problem from the perspective of the palm oil supply chain. Oil palm is a profitable commercial crop established as tolerating peat's wet and acidic conditions. Big companies have often targeted as the land clearing culprits, and many have knuckled down to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) certification and a few had Indonesian courts impose fines and jail terms for poor fire control efforts. Now, the immediate fire blame is shifting to independent fanners and smallholders as concessionaires have adjusted their practices. Despite the new blame-the-farmer trend, the authorities have started to revoke and freeze concessions. Also, the World Bank reckons that "a few hundred businesses and a few thousand farmers seek to profit from land and plantation speculation practices." We consider various policy options. Reactive policies include boycotts and buying sustainably certified products; these may be counter-productive as expected multi-tier prices, may suppress prices for farmers in the least desired peat zone product origins. Proactive solutions may seek to improve farmer economic outcomes (with consideration of product prices and/or subsidies) and extension services for responsible peat zone development. This paper expands on the authors' work in "Haze Control through the Sustenance of Indonesian Oil Palm Smallholders" in Thinking ASEAN Issue 5 / November 2015, The Habibie Center.
机译:东南亚可愿意看到最糟糕的,肯定是2015年11月至11月之间最长,泥炭驱动的阴霾烟雾污染。超过100,000次火灾已经燃烧了大约200万公顷,显然受到El Nino气候条件和印度尼西亚选举循环的影响。在加里曼丹和苏门答腊省的约4300万印度尼西亚人接触到有毒烟雾。邻国还忍受了阴霾烟雾漂移。这十年的旧问题于1997年8月爆发,大概是扩大油棕和其他现金作物。这领导了东南亚国家(东盟)协会(东盟)签署了2002年跨界阴霾污染协议(由印度尼西亚批准2014年)。它对欧洲主导的非政府组织(非政府组织)的可持续棕榈油运动带来了。尽管有这些措施,但该问题每年都会恢复。从棕榈油供应链的角度来看,我们研究了对问题的政治经济和解决问题的解决方案。油棕是一种盈利的商业作物,建立了耐受泥炭的湿润和酸性条件。大公司经常被瞄准为土地清算罪魁祸首,许多人在可持续的棕榈油(RSPO)认证上的圆桌会议上,少数人为印度尼西亚法院施加了罚款和监禁罚款,以获得贫困的火灾控制努力。现在,随着特许经营商调整了他们的实践,即右的火焰责任正在转向独立的泳柜和小型人。尽管新责任为农民趋势,当局已经开始撤销和冻结优惠。此外,世界银行审议“几百名企业和几千名农民寻求从土地和种植型投机实践中获利。”我们考虑各种政策选择。反应政策包括抵制和购买可持续认证的产品;这些可能随着预期的多层价格而富有成证,可能会抑制农民在最不期望的泥炭区产品起源中的价格。主动解决方案可能会寻求提高农民经济成果(考虑产品价格和/或补贴)和负责泥炭区发展的推广服务。本文扩大了作者在“通过印度尼西亚油棕榈小农”在2015年11月5日/ 11月的思维,哈比希中心的工作中的作者在“阴霾控制”中的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号