首页> 外文会议>International Cold Climate HVAC Conference >Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods in Building Energy Assessment
【24h】

Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods in Building Energy Assessment

机译:建筑能源评估中灵敏度分析方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Sensitivity analysis is an important tool in building energy assessment to determine the key factors influencing energy use or carbon emissions for buildings. This research is focused on comparing the characteristics of four global sensitivity analysis: SRC (standardized regression coefficient), Morris design, extended FAST (Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test) and TGP (treed Gaussian process) method. A retail building located at Harbin (China) is used as a case study to demonstrate the advantages and drawbacks for these four methods. The results indicate that the TGP method (one of meta-modelling approaches) is the best choice in terms of both accuracy and computationally cost. Note that the TGP method needs more time to calculate the sensitivity index although it needs only moderate time for running building energy models. At least two fundamentally different methods for sensitivity analysis are recommended to be performed to provide more robust results in building energy assessment.
机译:敏感性分析是建立能源评估的重要工具,以确定影响能源使用或建筑物碳排放的关键因素。该研究专注于比较四种全局敏感性分析的特点:SRC(标准化回归系数),莫里斯设计,延伸快速(傅里叶幅度灵敏度测试)和TGP(Treed高斯过程)方法。位于哈尔滨(中国)的零售建筑被用作案例研究,以证明这四种方法的优点和缺点。结果表明,TGP方法(元建模方法之一)是准确性和计算成本方面的最佳选择。请注意,TGP方法需要更多的时间来计算灵敏度索引,尽管它仅需要运行建筑能量模型的中等时间。建议执行至少两个用于敏感性分析的方法,以便在建立能源评估方面提供更强大的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号