首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Process Engineering and Advanced Materials >Comparative Study of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Modelling of Water-Gas Shift Reaction with Macro-or Micro-kinetics
【24h】

Comparative Study of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Modelling of Water-Gas Shift Reaction with Macro-or Micro-kinetics

机译:宏观或微动力学均匀和异质建模的对比研究

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents critical studies on water-gas shift reaction (WGSR) kinetic models as well as the modelling approaches of the reactor, in which the reaction is conducted-the packed-bed tubular reactor (PBTR). There are two different types of models often used to represent the WGSR kinetics: (1) macro-kinetics and (2) micro-kinetics types. The PBTR models can be divided into homogeneous and heterogeneous types. There have been lots of positive and negative arguments regarding the use of different models for the WGSR reactor simulation and design. So far, no solid evidence regarding which form of kinetics model is considered to be the most accurate and suitable for reactor design and simulation. Answering this question is the main objective of this paper, where several major kinds of kinetic-reactor models are compared based on the same Cu (111) catalyst. The different models are used to predict the CO conversion of the shift reactor and their accuracies are compared against a reported experimental data. The analysis shows that the micro-kinetics gives better accuracy than the macro-kinetics model. Interestingly, the results show that the macro-kinetics model used in the homogeneous reactor modelling can give prediction as accurate as that of the more complex micro-kinetics model provided in the former case, the transfer limitation correction factor is included. The comparison among these different models shall provide a better understanding on the selection of model form when it comes to designing the reactor involved.
机译:本文提出了对水 - 气体移位反应(WGSR)动力学模型以及反应器的建模方法的关键研究,其中反应 - 填充床管式反应器(PBTR)。经常有用于表示WGSR动力学两种不同类型的模型:(1)宏观动力学和(2)微动力学类型。 PBTR模型可分为均匀和异质类型。有关WGSR反应堆仿真和设计的不同模型的使用存在很多积极和消极的论据。到目前为止,没有关于哪种形式的动力学模型的固体证据被认为是最准确,适用于反应堆设计和仿真。回答这个问题是本文的主要目的,其中基于相同的Cu(111)催化剂比较了几种主要类型的动力学反应器模型。不同的模型用于预测换档反应器的CO转化,并将其精度与报告的实验数据进行比较。分析表明,微动力学提供比宏动力学模型更好的准确性。有趣的是,结果表明,在均匀反应器建模中使用的宏动力学模型可以给出预测,尽可能准确,因为包括前壳体中提供的更复杂的微动画模型,包括转移限制校正因子。这些不同模型之间的比较应在设计涉及的反应器时,对模型形式的选择提供更好的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号