首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Management, Education Technology and Sports Science >Empirical Analysis on Dishonesty Behaviors of Main Bodies In Construction Ineffective Bidding
【24h】

Empirical Analysis on Dishonesty Behaviors of Main Bodies In Construction Ineffective Bidding

机译:施工中主要机构不诚实行为的实证分析

获取原文

摘要

In the process of engineering construction, due to various subjective or objective reasons, the bidding activities can not play the effectiveness of optimal deal and allocation of resources, so as to make the bidding become the format, is called the ineffective tendering in this paper. For the most prominent dishonesty behaviors of main bodies in construction ineffective bidding, this paper makes the empirical analysis through the real cases and analyzes the dishonesty behaviors and motivations of the main subjects including the tenderee, bidders, supervising levels and evaluation parties. For the most serious and prominent problem of bidding rigging, establish the game theory model. Finally, this article concludes that establishing the credit evaluation mechanism, strengthening the information disclosure, introducing bidding supervision and report incentive mechanism can help to reduce the dishonesty behaviors. From long term view, it also help to weaken the preference of bidding dishonesty and change the social atmosphere so that bidding system can play better for the role of effective allocation of social resources.
机译:在工程建设过程中,由于各种主观或客观的原因,招标活动不能发挥最佳交易的有效性和资源的分配,以便使竞标成为格式,被称为本文的无效招标。对于施工招标无效主体的最突出的不诚实行为,本文对通过实际案例进行实证分析,分析的不诚实行为,主要科目的动机,包括招标人,投标人,监督水平和评估方。对于竞标索具的最严重和突出的问题,建立了博弈论模型。最后,本文得出结论,建立信贷评估机制,加强信息披露,介绍招标监管和报告激励机制可以帮助减少不诚实的行为。从长远来看,它也有助于削弱招标不诚实和改变社会氛围的偏好,使得竞标制度可以更好地发挥社会资源的有效配置的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号