首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Materials Engineering, Manufacturing Technology and Control >A Study on Computerized Simulation of difference between CPM and CCPM
【24h】

A Study on Computerized Simulation of difference between CPM and CCPM

机译:CPM和CCPM差异的计算机化模拟研究

获取原文

摘要

The constant delays of projects demonstrate that traditional project planning methods may adopt an inefficient way to manage uncertainty. To tackle problems in traditional project system, CCPM (Critical Chain Project Management) was introduced by Goldratt(1997) to identify both task dependence and resource conflicts as main constraints within a project[1]. This method is characterized by applying Theory of Constraints in project management and inserting buffers to deal with uncertainty. Although CCPM have demonstrated certain success and is regarded as an alternative of traditional project planning technique, lots of projects still suffer from considerable failure. Given the condition that CCPM is still under doubt and has not been applied widely, this paper conducts investigation about difference between CCPM and CPM/PERT based on computerized simulation of case study.
机译:项目的持续延误表明,传统的项目规划方法可能采用低效管理不确定性的方法。为了解决传统项目系统中的问题,CCPM(关键链项目管理)由Goldratt(1997)引入,以确定任务依赖性和资源冲突作为项目中的主要约束[1]。该方法的特点是应用项目管理中的约束理论和插入缓冲区来处理不确定性。虽然中共展示了一定的成功,并且被视为传统项目规划技术的替代方案,但许多项目仍然遭受了相当大的失败。鉴于中共仍处于疑问的条件,尚未被广泛应用,本文对基于计算机化研究的CCPM和CPM / Pert之间的差异进行了调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号